Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

426

In the 15-page ruling on Monday, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman said that the plaintiffs, six United Airlines employees, had not established they would suffer 'imminent, irreparable harm' if he did not issue a preliminary injunction against the mandate.

Silly me. I would have thought it was the drug companies who would have had to prove that the plaintiffs weren't in any danger of irreparable harm.

> In the 15-page ruling on Monday, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman said that the plaintiffs, six United Airlines employees, had not established they would suffer 'imminent, irreparable harm' if he did not issue a preliminary injunction against the mandate. Silly me. I would have thought it was the drug companies who would have had to prove that the plaintiffs weren't in any danger of irreparable harm.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Preliminary injunction, doesn’t meant it won’t happen or they’ve lost their case.

Also since the ohsa mandate lawsuits were filed in more then 2 jurisdictions they’ll all be combined into one and a “lottery” will be held to se what court circuit the case will be held in.