Your opinion on what is fakenews may be influenced by what you like or would want to be true.
Cars are fun and cool. Needles are scary.
Therefore you may put a much higher if not impossible standard on anything that put cars in a bad light, while you accept any news as true that paints vaccines in a bad light.
>Your opinion on what is fakenews may be influenced by what you like or would want to be true.
Or it's the other way around... Everybody knows the BBC is fucking fakenews https://youtu.be/gsDMYA6Y678?t=174
I like the smell of gasoline and I don't like needles. Nor do I like people being coerced into taking the vaccine.
BBC may be fake news, but what about WebM? https://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/news/20090313/traffic-triples-heart-attack-risk
Or how about that gasoline until a few years ago contained lead:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetraethyllead
Concerns over the toxicity of lead[86] eventually led to the ban on TEL in automobile gasoline in many countries. Some neurologists have speculated that the lead phaseout may have caused average IQ levels to rise by several points in the US (by reducing cumulative brain damage throughout the population, especially in the young). For the entire US population, during and after the TEL phaseout, the mean blood lead level dropped from 16 μg/dL in 1976 to only 3 μg/dL in 1991.
Chronic exposure to TEL can cause long-term negative effects such as memory loss, delayed reflexes, neurological problems, insomnia, tremors, psychosis, loss of attention, and an overall decrease in IQ and cognitive function.
Our society poisoning itself with Lead on a large scale, which lowers IQ and attention span, might explain a few things. Wouldn't it?
(post is archived)