They cite natural news and The Expose. Not sure who the second one is.
They cite natural news and The Expose.
You think if there was proof of the CDC making this statement that they would cite the actual fucking CDC instead of two questionable "news"" sources. I stand by this being clickbait.
They are looking at CDC data and extrapolating the meaning of what the data shows. CDC is warning thru the data. Not sure that an actual press release is issued. That's my understanding.
They are looking at CDC data and extrapolating the meaning of what the data shows. CDC is warning thru the data. Not sure that an actual press release is issued.
Which only reinforces my position. The CDC didn't say anything at all in that case. The data is not a statement. Extrapolating the data is not necessarily truth. The whole article is a fearporn piece with no proper backing or citations. Why should anyone trust NewsPunch, Natural News or The Expose any more than the CDC, the WHO or the WEF? It's a bad article no matter how you slice it.
(post is archived)