![Major fire at Indianapolis Walmart distribution center. C'mon! This shit is becoming more and more obvious. [700x525 - 539KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/pmy9Kr.png){kind=link}
I looked up the number of large food distribution warehouses in the USA. Roughly 32,000 of them...took the number of incidents reported in one of the viral images...I think the one the wife sent was 64 centers had similar incidents.
what percent is 64 out of 32,000? Oh, wait..it's .003% hmmm...coincidentally the actual deathrate of the covid-19 virus in the wild.
aka, a red herring.
So based on raw numbers, you have a point.
What I’m curious to know at this point is the value of those which burned down VS all the others. IE, if any of these places which are burning down are especially important to the food supply. In other words, I have to assume that some distribution centers are more important than others. It stands to reason that they would be and not all are of equal importance in the grand scheme of the food supply.
An analogy I could use is the voter fraud. Someone told me that there isn’t “widespread voter fraud”, therefore 2020 wasn’t rigged. I countered with the fact that you only have to have fraud in a few select counties in a few select swing states to swing an entire election..because of the way that the electoral system in the US is set up.
So, sometimes it’s not just about the raw numbers and you have to dig deeper. Quantity is a useful metric, yes. But quality is just as important, if not more important 99% of the time. Your numbers only speak to quantity, but ignore quality.
One thing I know is that the glowies know exactly where to strike for maximum effect and with raising the least amount of suspicion. From a strategic perspective, it would make sense to strike as few times as necessary to achieve maximum affect. That way, their deeds can be buried under arguments like you are making: “but see the quantity and percentages, etc.” No mention of the quality, however.
It’s why they didn’t pull the exact same election fuckery in Texas or Oklahoma as they did in Michigan or Pennsylvania. They went for the few places that would have the desired result. Less exposure that way and still achieving the desired outcome.
I think the one the wife sent was 64 centers had similar incidents.
Assuming all are reported.
What about the previous years, for comparison?
I assume all would be reported by local news. The news loves fires.
I've worked at a large distribution center for a number of years and are familiar with the field. Low staff alone will kill lines, destroy equipment, put the center in danger. The warehouse I worked at was one of the largest built in it's time and during the time I worked there we had at least 10 fires, a couple were so bad I didn't think they would reopen the place....yet, within 48 hours we were back in business.
Now that I think about it...Fires are quite commonplace. I can recall at least 2 other fires at a sister center, one in which a cousin of mine was hospitalized.
I know a few people in management still. I'll call them later today and chat them up a bit. If I find out anything interesting I'll report back.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
I'm curious to see if there's a noticeable different from 3 years ago up until now.
Thanks. We can always take single points and make is sound bad, but knowing there is actually a spike and not some diversion or other kikery going on is great.
(post is archived)