So based on raw numbers, you have a point. What I’m curious to know at this point is the value of those which burned down VS all the others. IE, if any of these places which are burning down are especially important to the food supply. In other words, I have to assume that some distribution centers are more important than others. It stands to reason that they would be and not all are of equal importance in the grand scheme of the food supply. An analogy I could use is the voter fraud. Someone told me that there isn’t “widespread voter fraud”, therefore 2020 wasn’t rigged. I countered with the fact that you only have to have fraud in a few select counties in a few select swing states to swing an entire election..because of the way that the electoral system in the US is set up. So, sometimes it’s not just about the raw numbers and you have to dig deeper. Quantity is a useful metric, yes. But quality is just as important, if not more important 99% of the time. Your numbers only speak to quantity, but ignore quality. One thing I know is that the glowies know exactly where to strike for maximum effect and with raising the least amount of suspicion. From a strategic perspective, it would make sense to strike as few times as necessary to achieve maximum affect. That way, their deeds can be buried under arguments like you are making: “but see the quantity and percentages, etc.” No mention of the quality, however. It’s why they didn’t pull the exact same election fuckery in Texas or Oklahoma as they did in Michigan or Pennsylvania. They went for the few places that would have the desired result. Less exposure that way and still achieving the desired outcome.