WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

That's all well and good, but these are also the types who'd happily get assfucked by a tyrannical gov't. Just the fact that these retards are still wearing face-diapers says it all. White societies prior to jewish subversion were just as trusting and nowhere as gay and as conforming as these bugs.

[–] 2 pts

>White societies prior to jewish subversion were just as trusting and nowhere as gay and as conforming as these bugs.

lol

Just lol... What are you a wigger dreaming of wakanda? You think spartan society or nazi germany had anything to envy to medieval or modern japan when it comes to conformism? You think catholicism is all about you and yourself and your opinion about how society should be ordered and dealt with? No my friend... And those are just examples on top of my head

The word "individualism" itself is fairly recent

> In the English language, the word individualism was first introduced as a pejorative by utopian socialists such as the Owenites in the late 1830s, although it is unclear if they were influenced by Saint-Simonianism or came up with it independently.[10] A more positive use of the term in Britain came to be used with the writings of James Elishama Smith, who was a millenarian and a Christian Israelite. Although an early follower of Robert Owen, he eventually rejected Owen's collective idea of property and found in individualism a "universalism" that allowed for the development of the "original genius". Without individualism, Smith argued that individuals cannot amass property to increase one's happiness.[10] William Maccall, another Unitarian preacher and probably an acquaintance of Smith, came somewhat later, although influenced by John Stuart Mill, Thomas Carlyle and German Romanticism, to the same positive conclusions in his 1847 work Elements of Individualism.[11]

[–] 0 pt

I read that completely different than you did.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Well maybe you should stop assuming stuffs about me

>Modernity, a topic in the humanities and social sciences, is both a historical period (the modern era) and the ensemble of particular socio-cultural norms, attitudes and practices that arose in the wake of the Renaissance—in the Age of Reason of 17th-century thought and the 18th-century Enlightenment.

You believe anti conformism was the norm in any given society, prior to modernity? Anti conformists have always been frowned upon. It's only when modernity started to be a thing, that you started to get rooms for anti conformism. And of course, there's no such thing as anti conformism without individualism, and for individualism you need modernity. It's not for random reasons that protestantism started to come about around that era.

[–] 1 pt

Sure but they were wearing face diapers long before the scamdemic, so there is that ...

[–] 2 pts

Yeah, They considered it a courtesy. "Hey, i'm kinda sick so maybe don't get so close". ALMOST makes sense... But still pretty dumb.

[–] 0 pt

Ah yea, not really disagreeing - now i'm reminded of that skit where they're all repeatedly knocking their heads together being so polite and continuing to apologize to each other ....