The worst part is companies importing H-1B visa people with the intent to give them expensive training instead of someone who was born in the country and treat the visa like an indentured survitude agreement.
Then the companies get politicians to claim that there just aren't enough educated Americans to fill the positions and that colleges need more subsidies so that more Americans can receive the training they need to work the jobs.
The jobs the companies don't want to hire the Americans for because they can't hold firing them and deportation over the American employees heads.
So they wind up with American kids wasting years of their lives and getting saddled with debt going to colleges to compete with foreigners who are imported and paid to learn the skills on the job by the company.
And then the politicians turn around and gaslight the American people.
Agreed but I think it may be worse unfortunately.
Committee of Science & Public Policy at the National Academy of Sciences (NAS).
I guarantee you there was a financial motive for them to fudge the study.
In another interview/discussion (Eric was the interviewer) he explicitly states the "fudged" numbers in the study were chosen to guarantee a result. Financial/state action as China benefits substantially.
(post is archived)