Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Lots of spooks in the comments claiming the missile explosion was a sonic boom and making other false claims. They go after every comment with their propaganda.

They want to claim it was low flying when the radar indicates it was at 34000 ft. I'm not an expert here but one comment claims the no fly zone is below 18000ft. So likely this was an illegal shoot down.

They are also claiming the plane was not shot down. 3 frames show that it fell from 34000 to 30000 and accelerated from 460mph to over 575mph before the radar stopped giving telemetry. That was just as it made what looks like a u turn, but given the speed increase and altitude loss can only be a nosedive that reversed the planes trajectory.

They are in major damage control mode on what is clearly an illegal shooting down of a small plane that was not breaking any laws.

Lots of spooks in the comments claiming the missile explosion was a sonic boom and making other false claims. They go after every comment with their propaganda. They want to claim it was low flying when the radar indicates it was at 34000 ft. I'm not an expert here but one comment claims the no fly zone is below 18000ft. So likely this was an illegal shoot down. They are also claiming the plane was not shot down. 3 frames show that it fell from 34000 to 30000 and accelerated from 460mph to over 575mph before the radar stopped giving telemetry. That was just as it made what looks like a u turn, but given the speed increase and altitude loss can only be a nosedive that reversed the planes trajectory. They are in major damage control mode on what is clearly an illegal shooting down of a small plane that was not breaking any laws.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (32).
[–] • 2 pts (edited )

On board was a company director's (owner of the cessna) adult daughter , her 2yr old child, the nanny and the pilot. 4 people total. No radio contact was able to be made to the pilot. Curious if an issue with depressurization why it did a u turn and then flew off to eventually crash over some wooden mountains in virginia -auto pilot maybe - the F16 were said to have used flares to attempt to get the pilots attention after not able to raise radio contact but yea weird.

EDIT: Barbara Rumpel , business woman and daughter of a member of the NRA womans leadership forum - wife of John Rumpel and parents were previously big money donors of trump. Where's the q-tards at ?? they must have a hot spicy take.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

it did a u turn and then flew off

This is a lie. At the point of what appears to be a u turn the plane lost 4k feet of altitude and accelerated over 100 mph in a matter if seconds before the telemetry data was no longer displayed, probably because it was changing too fast.

It absolutely did not "fly off".

There is absolutely no way to verify that the pilot was not responding. Only if someone leaks audio of the pilot communicating can you prove it a lie, but you have to trust the word of the prople who are lying about shooting it down to believe there was no communication.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Goofy , go argue with the released facts, it did a u turn and continued to fly straight over DC or some such then did a sudden altitude drop spiraling into the ground. you're clearly confused again.

And wrong yet again.

Edit; From msm 'The flight did a U-Turn over Washington DC on its flightpath while heading toward New York. NORAD aircraft used flares to try and draw attention from the pilot. ' and yes it flew off, bc it clearly didnt crash land in DC. You're all types orf stupid today.

[–] • 0 pt

hur der the news said so therfore it must be true.

Fuck off retard. The video I posted literally proves that clame wrong.

Fucking kike.