Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

763

Trump won 2016 with 6% of the black vote, 28% of the Hispanic vote, and 54% of the white vote. According to the , in 2020 Trump received 35% of the Hispanic vote, 8% of the black vote, and 55% of the white vote. The puts it even higher: 11% black, 32% Hispanic, and 58% white.

Trump supposedly lost the election because of losing heavily black cities in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. There's no mathematical way that those two things can be reconciled. It doesn't matter how many voters turned out. If a larger percentage voted for Trump than in 2016, his margin of victory should be increased from 2016 by the same amount.

What am I missing?

Trump won 2016 with 6% of the black vote, 28% of the Hispanic vote, and 54% of the white vote. According to the [WSJ](https://www.wsj.com/graphics/votecast-2020/), in 2020 Trump received 35% of the Hispanic vote, 8% of the black vote, and 55% of the white vote. The [New York Times ](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/exit-polls-president.html)puts it even higher: 11% black, 32% Hispanic, and 58% white. Trump supposedly lost the election because of losing heavily black cities in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. There's no mathematical way that those two things can be reconciled. It doesn't matter how many voters turned out. If a larger percentage voted for Trump than in 2016, his margin of victory should be increased from 2016 by the same amount. What am I missing?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (55).
[–] • 0 pt

I know, but how do they explain it mathematically? How do they explain that a larger percentage of blacks voted for Trump this time around, but somehow that made him lose?

[–] • 0 pt

I know, but how do they explain it mathematically? How do they explain that a larger percentage of blacks voted for Trump this time around, but somehow that made him lose?

Because most of them were still voting for Biden and (allegedly) more of them turned out. So they were drowning out the white vote.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

It works because people are stupid.

The kike media just says “the black voter turnout was higher.”

So idiots believe that the raw black vote for dems swung it because they literally do not understand what a percent increase of the total vote even means.

We’ve been miseducated into ruin.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Well firstly the critical thinking skills we have are absent amoungst the sheep who believe the narrative. The official story is that national averages not withstanding...Trump did poorly in those key cities because they "turned out the vote"

[–] • 0 pt

They say more people voted than last elections

[–] • 1 pt

There's no mathematical way to make that work. It doesn't matter if 10 vote or 100,000,000. We're talking about percentages.

[–] • 0 pt

Basically, to make it work out mathematically, you'd have to have either a lot more blacks and hispanics voting but not many more whites voting, or a lot less whites voting.

[–] • 0 pt

A smaller percentage of whites voted for him because he’s a useless goy

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, but he was (((your))) guy

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

NY Times and WSJ say a higher percentage of whites voted for him than in 2016.