Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

552

Trump won 2016 with 6% of the black vote, 28% of the Hispanic vote, and 54% of the white vote. According to the , in 2020 Trump received 35% of the Hispanic vote, 8% of the black vote, and 55% of the white vote. The puts it even higher: 11% black, 32% Hispanic, and 58% white.

Trump supposedly lost the election because of losing heavily black cities in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. There's no mathematical way that those two things can be reconciled. It doesn't matter how many voters turned out. If a larger percentage voted for Trump than in 2016, his margin of victory should be increased from 2016 by the same amount.

What am I missing?

Trump won 2016 with 6% of the black vote, 28% of the Hispanic vote, and 54% of the white vote. According to the [WSJ](https://www.wsj.com/graphics/votecast-2020/), in 2020 Trump received 35% of the Hispanic vote, 8% of the black vote, and 55% of the white vote. The [New York Times ](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/exit-polls-president.html)puts it even higher: 11% black, 32% Hispanic, and 58% white. Trump supposedly lost the election because of losing heavily black cities in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. There's no mathematical way that those two things can be reconciled. It doesn't matter how many voters turned out. If a larger percentage voted for Trump than in 2016, his margin of victory should be increased from 2016 by the same amount. What am I missing?

(post is archived)

[–] • 7 pts

its called gaming the system, get key locations completely corrupted and you win

[–] • 5 pts

We all know that, but what's the cover story? How are they explaining how someone can lose an election despite increasing their support among all key demographics?

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Normies eat up the "Hillary won the popular vote" narrative. He can gain votes and still "lose" by a margin unquestioned by normies.

[–] • 1 pt

It's mathematically not possible, though. If his support was higher among all demographics, his margin has to be larger than 2016.

[–] • 0 pt

We all know that, but what's the cover story? How are they explaining how someone can lose an election despite increasing their support among all key demographics?

See my other comment. Even if he gained support in black and hispanic areas, those areas still mostly "voted" for biden. So any increase in turnout in those areas is a proportionate increase for biden, not trump.

If an extra ten million blacks turn out to vote, and Trump controls 10% of that vote, that's an extra 9 million votes for Biden and 1 million extra for Trump.

[–] • 0 pt

"Put on your mask". That's how.

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

The bellweather counties alone tell you it's bullshit. I don't give a shit what people say, it's not possible to win all those and lose like this.

[–] • 3 pts

Just wait on the Maricopa county audit to finish. :)

[–] • 1 pt

Shall we trust the plan also?

[–] • 0 pt

I mean this is the precipice. You can joke all you want but this is the time we either figure out one of two things. 1.) Either Donald Trump is a massive liar and Israel shill and there was no fraud OR 2.) There was massive fraud and they are about to come with the receipts. I fully expect if a massive fraud is revealed that the pussy-ass republicans won't do shit about it. They won't riot, they might protest a little but they won't show up with their guns or execute the people that need executed for Treason. Basically I believe Biden will continue to be the president and they won't overturn it but they will find massive fraud and then talk about how they can prevent it the next 4 years.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

He allowed it to go down. He was the one man in a position to do something about the massive fraud and not only did nothing to prevent it but after the fact he let them get away with it.

[–] • 2 pts

He's part of whatever is going on.

[–] • 0 pt

I wanted to believe, but 3 months into the Biden Presidency, I sadly have to agree with you.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

They claim that Joe Biden got more votes in those 3 key cities. No one will ever know for sure because they obstructed poll watchers

[–] • 0 pt

I know, but how do they explain it mathematically? How do they explain that a larger percentage of blacks voted for Trump this time around, but somehow that made him lose?

[–] • 0 pt

I know, but how do they explain it mathematically? How do they explain that a larger percentage of blacks voted for Trump this time around, but somehow that made him lose?

Because most of them were still voting for Biden and (allegedly) more of them turned out. So they were drowning out the white vote.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

It works because people are stupid.

The kike media just says “the black voter turnout was higher.”

So idiots believe that the raw black vote for dems swung it because they literally do not understand what a percent increase of the total vote even means.

We’ve been miseducated into ruin.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Well firstly the critical thinking skills we have are absent amoungst the sheep who believe the narrative. The official story is that national averages not withstanding...Trump did poorly in those key cities because they "turned out the vote"

[–] • 0 pt

They say more people voted than last elections

[–] • 1 pt

There's no mathematical way to make that work. It doesn't matter if 10 vote or 100,000,000. We're talking about percentages.

[–] • 0 pt

A smaller percentage of whites voted for him because he’s a useless goy

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, but he was (((your))) guy

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

NY Times and WSJ say a higher percentage of whites voted for him than in 2016.

[–] • 1 pt

And stealing elections is 100% possible.

[–] • 1 pt

You need to hold them responsible when turnout goes back to normal (60m range) from the cheating high (80m range) in 2024.

[–] • 1 pt

In reality, Trump traded 5% of the White vote for 2% of the nigger vote, and that's why they were able to commit the fraud.

[–] • 0 pt

Except his white % increased also.

[–] • 0 pt

What am I missing?

Voter fraud aside, not the same proportions of demographics voted in each election.

If more blacks turned out to vote in 2020 then that would shift things in Biden's favour even if he had a slightly lower overall proportion of that demographic. Let's say ten million extra blacks turned out, that's 9 million extra votes for Biden and 1 million extra votes for Trump.

[–] • 0 pt

You're missing the jewish question. jews cast 6 million more votes for Biden than they cast for Hillary.

Load more (10 replies)