Since most households need two incomes it can also be so the father gets bonding time after the wife has recovered and has to return to work, before the kid is dumped into the fulltime childcare/school pipeline. But you're right if there was no reason for one of them to stay home from work the one that is a damned cabinet position level person should not be neglecting an entire country while the kid is that tiny. On the books he makes 221k/year they don't need a second income and most of what his husband does can be done remotely. The idea that you get a kid and there isn't a trade off is absurd, but that trade off shouldn't be the whole country's supply line tanks to shit because you can't step in and override California's emissions standards for interfering with interstate commerce because you're at home watching Spongebob.
Yep, I think the Father's role steps up when the child begins experiencing the world, basic care is best handled by the woman while the Father provides security.
This is distorted by the State trying to do that job, because Marxism, but it should be recognised as corrosive whenever possible.
I bet Buttigeg was told to stay home so the Democrats could virtue signal about how progressive they were. "look, our pet fag can do childcare just like a real woman, and everyone clapped..."
They probably asked that pedo Lavine to do it first with an adopted niglet
(post is archived)