Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

645

https://pic8.co/sh/WfaN60.png

So in otherwords, the soldiers

  1. outed themselves for applying a religious exemption

  2. are likely be given hot batches when discharged for refusing the vax.

This is murder and totalitarianism out in the open.

If I had to guess, there are number of people that consider this an absolute red line.

https://pic8.co/sh/WfaN60.png So in otherwords, the soldiers 1. outed themselves for applying a religious exemption 2. are likely be given hot batches when discharged for refusing the vax. This is murder and totalitarianism out in the open. If I had to guess, there are number of people that consider this an absolute red line.

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

It's not vaxed and discharged. It's vaxed or discharge. There is an entire bit of context in that tweet that someone must not be able to understand.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It's not vaxed and discharged. It's vaxed or discharge.

You're right. Thank you.

Be frank though, you and I both know if they can get away with discharging and force-jabbing soldiers, they will.

[–] • 0 pt

They shoot'em up with some nasty shit as is. We live in a pretty sterile point in time, even with all the craziness going on.

[–] • 5 pts

This is disgusting. Uniparty 'my body my choice' people are full of bull crap.

[–] • 4 pts (edited )

'my body my choice'

The uniparty doesn't care about 'my body my choice'. As is apparent from this.

It's a big tent they use to herd voters into manufactured legitimacy. The elections exist to say to the international community that the regime is a legitimate democracy/republic/whatever the fuck, and not in fact what it is: which is an illegal military-intelligence regime instituted through a coup. One which is engaged in using violent covert subversion against an occupied territory. One that uses an apparent two-party system, where one does the decision making, and the outer party (RNC) which exists to occupy public perception and give them hope while running interference against dissidents aligned against the inner party (DNC). These operate as a racket under the definition of RICO, and both frequently engage in terrorism through the fifth branch, largely used to justify domestic operations against the citizens of the occupied territories.

Meanwhile the manufactured image of legitimacy is important as a cover for international warfare and undeclared wars against other regimes, on the very basis of labeling them as illegitimate dictatorships.

It's totalitarianism. We live under an illegitimate, illegal, totalitarian occupation government brazenly parading as a 'democracy', showing all the outward signs of being one, with all the traditions and ceremonies of being an elected system, blared forth by multi-billion dollar news agency that are outright propaganda operations that operate in the daylight. Everyone who is anyone knows it. Numerous people have said it. Everyone see it. And yet they operate with impunity.

They are at war with us. We are in a war. They want to dominate us and loot us and deprive us. And we are not being given a viable option to say no peacefully.

[–] • 2 pts

That's the whole reason that they overturned Roe vs Wade. Shills and idiots helped to suppress that, though.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

There is a lot of violence coming. Just be prepared when the power goes out, food runs out and the bombs start coming in the biggest economic crash of modern history.

Thanks femorats!

The legacy of Biden is going to be tainted like Kim Kardashian's asshole when she leaves a Chipotle and runs out of food so she goes to popeyes and taco bell before totally blowing up her toilet a few hours after with a spicy chocolate waterfall.

Calling Biden a great and popular President is like saying the Titanic voyage was a beautiful and fun boat trip.

[–] • 0 pt

ust be prepared when the power goes out, food runs out a

A common refrain, but thank you anyway Wilhelm. You're always there offering advice freely.

[–] • 0 pt

I think you're being cynical again.. or sarcastic.

[–] • 0 pt

No I was being genuine. It's always easy to doubt our own doommongering. But knowing something is true, and believing it is true are two different things. Denial exists in the latter.

So thanks.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

RNC tried to insert amendments to block the military vax mandate.... Democrats blocked all those attempts. That is what MTG is referring to in that tweet. Your post seems to imply that the GOP supports vax mandates. They absolutely don't support the vax mandate, but don't have the votes needed to essentially countermand Biden's unconstitutional Executive Order.

Note that Dems don't have the votes to CREATE a vax mandate.....but because Biden's handlers had him issue a BS Executive Order, they don't need any.... they just meed enough to block the GOP.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/20/democrats-blocked-republican-amendments-to-end-military-vaccine-mandate/

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/09/09/executive-order-on-requiring-coronavirus-disease-2019-vaccination-for-federal-employees/

[–] • 4 pts

They only did it becuase they are the minority. If they were the majority, it would have sat on Mitch's Desk until the next minority leader took it.

[–] • 1 pt

I think Mitch McConnel is a completely corrupt piece of crap, so it's possible he might have tried this....but super unlikely he'd be able to do it and maintain any semblance of not being a complete RINO, so I think the GOP would have succeeded in creating legislation to reverse the mandate.

However, Biden and the Marxists would have simply vetoed it.

[–] • 0 pt

How many of them endorsed the vax?

How many said "I'm not an antivaxxer and my family and I got vaxxed, but we support the right to choose."

No they don't. This is lipservice. Everyone that chooses to get it is endorsing it. *especially sitting politicians.

They absolutely don't support the vax mandate,

Was that before or after Trump and a half a dozen others told people to get their vaxx?

When half the country was fighting it and already demoralized.

RNC tried to insert amendments to block the military vax mandate.... Democrats blocked all those attempts.

Oh really? Was that before or after the RNC gave away its majority under trump so they'd have another excuse for not fighting their bosses in the DNC?

More fucking excuses. They deserve the same march to the sea that every other souleless creature in DC deserves.

They stood with their dicks in hands while lockdowns killed people. They are my enemies.

[–] • 0 pt

Endorsing and mandating are two wildly different things. Trump never mandated anything, nor did his admin, nor did the GOP.

The GOP has staunchly opposed mandates from the begimning.

[–] • 0 pt

Endorsing and mandating are different!

lol, thinks endorsing something that cripples and kills people is morally much different from mandating it.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I think there might be a reading comprehension issue here because of poor twitter writing by Rep Greene. Imaging this with the ampersand replaced by the word "and," and a comma after the words "vaxxed" and "refused":

"The program allowing the military to force people to be vaxxed, and discharged if they refuse, will likely remain in the NDAA."

They can't force you to take a shot AFTER you're discharged. We just have illiterates running Congress, that's all. Rest peacefully, Billy!

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

They can't force

They can do whatever the fuck they want if they're breaking the law or forcing it at gun point.

Maybe I'm mistaken but a lot of people seem to think the law or morality is some magical force that physically restrains employees and mercenaries in the regime from abusing people.

The law is an abstraction. If you want to know what they think of the constitution, what it is to the regime, go ask bush. "Just a bunch of fucking words on paper."

They're our enemies and we are in a war against them. Doesn't matter that we didn't start it. Doesn't matter that we didn't want it.

Doesn't change a thing.

It's a war.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I think you might be weak-minded if you believe that a government employee is going to force a discharged soldier to receive a clot shot at gunpoint on exit. So weak-minded that I suspect that drugs might be at play here. No one can be that stupid in the absence of chemical brain damage, surely?

[–] • 0 pt

I think you might be weak-minded if you believe that a government employee is going to force a discharged soldier to receive a clot shot at gunpoint on exit.

I think you underestimate the duplicitous stupidity of a sufficiently too-far-gone government.

I don't do drugs and I don't tolerate drugs. And the fact you feel comfortable throwing that out there without knowing me, makes me question if you are an addict.

[–] • 1 pt

Hi. I'm in the middle of this pickle and actually know what's going on, so please allow me to illuminate you reactionists to what's actually going on.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/20/democrats-blocked-republican-amendments-to-end-military-vaccine-mandate/

Democrats blocked amendments in the house that would've killed the Biden vax mandate, especially in light of the supreme court decision about the Texas case and the opinions talking about how shitty the Navy has treated those of us who submitted the religious accommodation requests.

Instead of getting worked up over a screenshot of a tweet, maybe do some research. Then, if you can't find anything besides social media posts, maybe read into the context of the post. Or just understand proper grammar.

"The program" is the preparatory subject leading to the independent clause: "allowing the military to force people to be vaxxed" which is immediately followed by the dependent clause: "& discharged if they refuse," etc.

Nobody is getting forced to take the jab AFTER they're kicked out.

Details matter.

[–] • 0 pt

Fine "before they're discharged."

[–] • 1 pt

totalitarianism

I'm glad I've reached some finally to use the proper label.