Alright, here we go. Enjoy your BTC from .
First off, are the sources I'm using so you can double check for yourself. It's the same event told from both Matthew and Mark's perspective. are the same passages but in KJV rather than NIV because I know sometimes you Christcucks get frustrated about which translation is right. Those are just the links; I'll copy the verses below for convenience.
First, let's look at the larger context according to and .
The day starts with Jesus arguing with the Pharisees. Afterwards, he wants to rest and be left alone, so he and his disciples go hideout in a house, trying to lay low. While hiding, a Greek woman finds him.
MARK 7: 24 Jesus left that place and went to the vicinity of Tyre. He entered a house and did not want anyone to know it; yet he could not keep his presence secret. 25 In fact, as soon as she heard about him, a woman whose little daughter was possessed by an impure spirit came and fell at his feet. 26 The woman was a Greek, born in Syrian Phoenicia. She begged Jesus to drive the demon out of her daughter.
27 “First let the children eat all they want,” he told her, “for it is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”
28 “Lord,” she replied, “even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.”
29 Then he told her, “For such a reply, you may go; the demon has left your daughter.”
30 She went home and found her child lying on the bed, and the demon gone.
The first, most important thing to note is that her ethnicity is GREEK and that she was born in Syrian Phoenicia. We're going to look at Matthew's account for the rest of it because it's all the same as Mark's account except that Matthew neglects to point out that she's Greek and merely calls her "Canaanite" because she wasn't Jewish.
MATTHEW 15: 21 Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. 22 A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is demon-possessed and suffering terribly.”
23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.”
24 He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.”
25 The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said.
26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”
27 “Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”
28 Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.
Let's take a look at verse 24 in the KJV:
MATTHEW 15: 24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Alright, now that we've got all the text we're going to use, let's examine the sequence of events.
Firstly, Jesus spends the morning arguing with and debating the Pharisees, the leadership of the Jews who he views to be corrupt. Once done, he seeks some solitude in order to rest and relax. He is, however, sought out and found by a Greek woman. His disciples urge him to send her away, and Jesus agrees, saying, "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." This is him very explicitly denying her because she is not Jewish. He is a Jewish Messiah for Jewish People. His mission is to expose and remove the corrupt leadership of Jews, the Pharisees. They could be thought of as shepherds, leading astray the "lost sheep of the house of Israel." The woman, however, persists, and begs for a miracle.
Jesus tells her, "It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to the dogs." This explictly demonstrates that, in his view, his people, the Jews, are the children of god, and non-Jews are "dogs." In the context of the time, calling someone a dog was literally calling them subhuman.
The woman replies with, "Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master's table." Jesus then agrees to heal her daughter. He steadfastly refused to help her until she acknowledges her place as a subhuman dog and the Jews as her masters.
All throughout the Old Testament, the Torah, the Talmud, Rabbinical Teachings, etc, YHWH is a JEWISH ETHNODEITY. Goyim are "as the beasts of the Earth" that exist only to serve Jews. Jesus never once contradicted this and he even confirmed it with the above event.
FROM HIS OWN MOUTH.
Now, you are undoubtedly going to quote some other nonsense to me, all of which will be someone who is NOT Jesus contradicting him after the fact or something Jesus said taken out of context. Here is a common one I see:
JOHN 3: 16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.
First of all, this is not spoken by Jesus. Would you not agree that when Jesus says one thing and someone else contradicts him, the correct one to believe would be Jesus? Additionally, this was written by John who, like the rest of them, view Goyim as subhuman and almost certainly only meant Jews when he said, "whoever." To clarify, no one would say, "Whoever believes in Jesus goes to heaven, except animals and plants and stuff." That goes without saying, just as not including Goyim goes without saying.
Here is an absolute favorite of Christcucks, and one I know you have already thought of before reading this far:
GALATIANS 3: 23 Before the coming of this faith, we were held in custody under the law, locked up until the faith that was to come would be revealed. 24 So the law was our guardian until Christ came that we might be justified by faith. 25 Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian.
26 So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Ah, Saul. What a guy. He neither met nor knew Jesus. He hated him. Considered him a false Messiah and his followers heretics. He made quite a career of killing the shit out of them and persecuting them however he could. And you trust that a Jew had a change of heart and decided to love Goyim? The only account of Jesus appearing to Saul is from Saul himself.
You, as a blind cuck, read the event and cream your pants about how magical your Jewish God is. Any normal person capable of reasoning recognizes one of the oldest Jewish tricks when they see it: subversion.
At some point Saul admitted defeat. He knew he could not exterminate the branch of Judaism known as Christianity, so he changed tactics and subverted it instead. "Hey guys, Jesus just appeared to me and is completely contradicting everything he said early! Guess he changed his mind after he died. Neat!" He then weaponized Christianity and used it to erase and replace the natural spirituality of the Goyim - if he couldn't crush Christianity, he could at least weaponized it to give the Europeans a Judeocentric worldview and view Jews as the Chosen People with the promise that they can be Chosen People too.
And you know what? I think that, deep down, many Christcucks know this for true. That's why they do weird mental gymnastics like, "WHITE PEOPLE WERE THE REAL ANCIENT JEWS!!!" then turn around and mock niggers for thinking they were Ancient Egyptians.
One last thing:
Why do you insist on Hellenizing everyone's names? You do realize that Jesus was not his name and that Christ is an honorific. Why do you call him Jesus instead of Yeshua? Why do you call him Christ instead of Messiah? Because deep down, your blood knows you're betraying your ancestors. Here is a short list of some of the disciples proper names:
Simon The Zealot שמעון (Shimon) It means "he has heard"
Thomas תאום (Ta’om) It means "twin"
Bartholomew בר תלמי (Natanel Bar Talmey / Nathanel son of Talmey) It means the “son of Talmai”
John יוחנן (Yohhanan) It means “God is gracious”
Andrew (Greek origin, Andraus) The New Testament does not give us any clues to his original Hebrew and Aramaic names, so most likely he used his Greek name. It means “manly, masculine”
Peter (Greek origin, variant of Petros) It means “stone” or “rock”
James the Greater & James The Lesser יעקב (Ya’akov) James the Lesser was the uncle of James the Greater. The meaning of the name is “he who supplants”
Phillip (Greek origin, variant of Philipos) It means “friend of horses”
Matthew מתתיה (Mattathia) It means “gift of God”
Judas יהודה (Yehudah) It means “praised”
I mean, most Christcucks probably couldn't name more disciples than, "Matthew, Mark, Luke, John" and after centuries of those names being used in Western Civilization of course there is going to be the subconscious sentiment that that means the ancient disciples were Europeans.
Why not call them by their real names?
Because deep in the heart of every Christcuck they know that Christianity is Judaism with a false Messiah for the Goyim to worship, but they don't have the fucking courage to admit that they were tricked!
As far as I'm concerned, this is checkmate. You'll be too proud and shamed for being cucked for Jews to admit you're wrong and you'll quote authorities lesser than Yeshua or something, but this is inarguable.
I have nothing to add to 's answer here https://poal.co/s/Videos/385276/768ab2c9-d30d-4720-8087-df45f1e6ce3d#cmnts
Lemme know what you buy with your new BTC
I'm not into bitcoin
You have an interesting interpretation of the Bible.
It's interesting when you look at the literal translation of the word Jesus the Christ uses for "Israel" in Matt 15:24. The word "Israhl" is used to describe the chosen people of God. Either literal descendants of Israel (Jacob) or the "elect" or "chosen" children of God.
Notice in Revelation 7:9
Revelation 7:9 , NIV: "After this I looked, and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands."
Interesting how the chosen people of God are from all nations, languages. Not specifically one race or group of people, but a multitude from all nations and tribes. Hence, the people "of Israel" that Jesus is describing isn't some group of people who call themselves jews. It's the chosen people of God.
The Israeltes broke the covenant God made with them. Hence why God sent his son Jesus to bring about the new covenant.
Prophecy of Christ's coming
Jeremiah 31:31-34. "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah; not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; forasmuch as they broke My covenant, although I was a lord over them, saith the LORD. But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the LORD, I will put My law in their inward parts, and in their heart will I write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people ...
Jesus reaffirming the new covenant.
Luke 22:20. “This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you ...
To recap: 1) New covenant is not made with the specific geneological descendants of Jacob, 2) the "house of Israel" is the elect, God's chosen, the children of the new covenant.
You make some intriguing points. Much of the basis for them is misinterpretation. Like when you think Jesus is calling non-jews "dogs." Is he calling non-jews "dogs", or is he describing sinners in general? If you consider the context of the time this event occurred, you'll note that the "jews" saw themselves as far superior to the "gentiles." Thus, this woman was more than aware of the breach in decorum. A gentile speaking to a jew and a Rabbi at that?! Unheard of. So Jesus poses her the question, and she responds with a demonstration of her faith.
My main gripe with your position is that, if you actually read the Bible in context, you'll realize it has nothing nice to say about jews. In fact, it is implied that the people who inhabit the land of Israel today are the children of the devil. This group is under a blood curse, and they serve lies (who is the master of lies but the devil himself).
I appreciate your thorough reply.
Matthew and Mark
For fucks sake, its the same book (along with Luke). Not sure i even want to read the rest of this...
(post is archived)