I'm not really convinced
Are you being serious here? Or are you joking?
I tuned in in time to see the second tower hit live, the fireball would have passed through and come out the other side if it were a fuel explosion, I'm not saying planes dropped the towers in free fall, and I know there was plane fuckery on the day, but I've heard too many witnesses who were there and saw the second plane hit, people I've known personally or just dudes I met on xbox.
That video is super inconclusive, if he had held on the towers the whole time, maybe, but he looked away, so why was he claiming he saw it?
>I've heard too many witnesses who were there and saw the second plane hit, people I've known personally or just dudes I met on xbox
Yeah I've heard others say the same, hard to figure this out.
I always tell people, look at master illusionists, they have crazy tricks than can fool anybody...imagine what the intel people have.
I don't see any point to not actually using planes, the fuel explosions were real, so if the building was rigged with thermite like I'm thinking it was they likely had radio activated ignition systems daisy chained from the top and bottom. Why bother not using planes, seriously just have a few mossad guys co-opt an al-qaeda cell and get them to do it, Then make sure all possible evidence points to al-qaeda so we can get a blank check for middle eastern fuckery, the mossad team probably intercepted communications to the al-qaeda team and so al-qaeda never even had to be aware what their boys were up to and the twin towers were already one of their targets so the rag heads doing the dirty work don't even have a clue they have been co-opted.
I'm not a no plane theorist but I'll tell you a story of when I was 17.
Was watching the news and I see this guy is holding up traffic. He got out of his car in heavy traffic and news was reporting a hostage situation.
Local news got a helicopter on the scene.
The guy got out, put a gun to his head, and killed himself, and it was right there on live TV.
The next day at school everyone was talking about it. Everyone saw it. Even myself.
Finally I talked to somebody who, made me realize I internalized the gunshot, and had not actually seen it. I was making a handgun to my head reenactment like everyone else, assuredly.
The reality was I was looking at the live tv broadcasts but looked away at that moment.
We reenacted the suicide and we kept reenacting with a finger pointed to the temple, like he shot himself in the temple.
But the guy, I later learned, got on his knees with a rifle or shotgun to his face, and pulled the trigger.
By the time I had the story corrected, I had shared my version of how he died 20 times.
Made me realize that I mass formed my own experience.
Imagine how much confusion I would have if cgi video existed of a pistol instead of a long gun.
What the camera is pointing at isn't necessarily where the cameraman is looking himself.
I can't imagine the camera pointed away because he just then decided to stare at the ground next to him. Looks to me like he was fixed upon the buildings above him on fire, and let the camera drift before the explosion.
Also, what about all the other footage showing no plane in OP's video?
I'm betting the camera was pointed away because he was checking something on the camera itself, I can't say I know that but he wouldn't have moved the camera so much if he wasn't checking it or changing positions, because he was obviously filming the scene with some intent to record this for posterity.
As to the other videos removing the plane from the footage would be easy, the one obvious bit of disinfo is at 9:30 in the OP video the guy claims the wing disappears behind a building when it should not here is a compilation of footage, 50 different shots of the second plane strike: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hApRZ_7v2A at 3:35 the same footage in question appears and you can see it's the same angle with the same vanishing wing, but in the rest of the video you can see the video it vanishes behind is clearly closer to the ground, there is no other large brown skyscraper behind the towers, the guy in the OP video critiquing the footage at these times is obviously fool of shit with a simple examination of the skyline. meaning who ever compiled the footage either too lazy to check the footage or intentionally trying to deceive us.
Why paint out the plane? why digitally remove it after the fact? why push flat earth? alienation and discord. You don't need to believe in a CGI plane to believe it was a false flag, so why push this unimportant narrative component. besides I'm sure you can admit that in all 50 of these shots the plane and it's motion are surprisingly consistent if it's CGI, even modern CGI sucks at comping moving objects and keeping their scale and movement identical across multiple shots. If this were done today it would require advanced 3D scans and motion tracking rigs to be this accurate. across all 50 perspectives.
I found the shot I saw as a child when it happened live, I was watching the "CBS: live camera" shot as it happened.
(post is archived)