![Do you? [827x407 - 53KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/xOotD5.jpg){kind=link}
If you believe RECKLESS DRIVERS are a risk to SEATBELT WEARERS, then you don’t really believe in seatbelts, do you?
If you believe MASS SHOOTERS are a risk to PEOPLE WITH A BULLET PROOF VESTS ON, then you don’t really believe in bullet proof vests, do you?
It has been established for months now that the vaccines are not 100% effective. What is so hard about that to understand?
Your counter example are badly wrong and don't apply.
It's established for months the vaccines are not and don't do anything.
The analogies are sound. Seatbelts and bullet proof vests provide protection, however the protection isn’t 100%.
There is tonnes of data to suggest the vaccines hugely reduce symptoms, hospitalisations and deaths due to covid infections.
my immune system is millions of years in the making (evolution/natural selection) vs your less than a year for your “vaccine”. however I do encourage you to get plenty of these vaccinations
Undeniable physical harm vs imaginary "harm" makes for counter examples wrong and incompatible.
Immune system in 99% effective. They claim 85% effective and then brinkmanshiped their way to 95% effective. They are falsely claiming efficacy of the body's immune system.
You have some basic research to do. Including in logic.
Please, do tell us the side effects of wearing seatbelts and bullet proof vests that are the equivalent to getting blood clots, new allergies and death that people get as a result of being vaccinated.
People burn to death in their cars because they’re trapped by their seatbelt. Is that “equivalent” enough for you?
Let's see. How many people burn to death in their cars from not being able to get off their seatbelts?
(post is archived)