WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

"By exploiting global inequality"

What a Jewish way of expressing this situation.

No one (in America anyway) is forcing a Chinese person to take $0.08 an hour to make shoes. But they (or some other country in poverty) are doing it. Why?

Cuz it's the best opportunity they have. If not, they'd surely go do whatever else they have there because it's better for them.

The thing is - it's benefiting both sides of the equation. And you can't really say one benefits more than the other because maybe the US gets more financially in total sum, but if they didn't they wouldn't be involved in this deal at all because it wouldn't be worth it to them. So they'd have less profit, but the poor person would now have nothing (or at least less)

This also seems to be the basis of Trumps negotiations with China. Basically hey - we need to renegotiate a better deal because we're getting fucked. And when China said no, China had to say no by losing more than the US would. So basically, China refusing to participate in this whole scheme was still a winning position for America

So yeah, just needed to pick this nit - the US isn't exploiting shit. The Chinese created way the fuck too many people to be able to support its own citizens, and now the US is providing them a shortcut to getting ahead.

[–] 1 pt

Insert fact that Trump won TWICE on bringing American jobs back and punishing companies for Made in China and Mex.

[–] 1 pt
[–] 1 pt

First American commies passed labor laws.

Then American commies opened trade to China.

Then Chinese commies deregulated. Damn near pure capitalist though with the party still owning the means of production just hands off.

With American workers operating under a heavily regulated economy now in competition to a capitalist one they were utterly outclassed. Tens of millions of jobs left the land.

They traded jobs for cheap goods and this trade saw the greatest wealth explosion in human history. Hundreds of millions of dark age peasants to modern Middle class in a generation.

Usa could not win an economic war vs china.

Population too diluted by shit skins and ideological programs and a state run economy.

Though one silver lining is ccp is increasingly interfering in their economy

[–] 0 pt

People who were alive in the 1980's know it was the Walton family of Walmart fame which demanded its suppliers begin to make things in China or be removed from Walmart stores. This was to increase Wal-Mart's profit margins. Walmart really started the commoditization of manufacturing American goods on China.

[–] 0 pt

Bs.

Demand came from consumers. When confronted with the same good but for cheaper they went with chine made.

Yeah early Chinese products sucked but so did consumer intelligence

[–] 0 pt

Chinese products STILL suck ass for anything more than one use.

[–] 0 pt

Sorry but you are wrong. There were numerous stories about this from manufacturers in the 1999's. Walmart told them manufacture in China or else

[–] 0 pt

Walmart is not the entirety of goods stores worldwide. Just a tiny fraction in fact. Yet every nation lost manufacturing to China.

The reasons were economic and predictactable.

And not a mention of kikes transferring manufacturing from the West to China as part of the process of destroying the West by draining all of its industries and its wealth.

[–] 0 pt

Americans are also to blame for this. They wanted cheap goods and the market provided it.

[–] 0 pt

It's everywhere the same, buying cheap is fine, but look at the downside.