![This not that [1078x1206 - 150KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/dwXWcY.jpg){kind=link}
The 1934 NFA was already an infringement. No SCOTUS, now or future, will overturn this. In fact, in Heller vs DC, 4 of the 9 ruled that an individual does not have a right to bear arms. They said 2A is the collective right of a militia.
"Legal" is simply a philosophical term used by people that haven't had to start fighting yet.
The 1934 NFA was already an infringement. No SCOTUS, now or future, will overturn this. In fact, in Heller vs DC, 4 of the 9 ruled that an individual does not have a right to bear arms. They said 2A is the collective right of a militia.
"Legal" is simply a philosophical term used by people that haven't had to start fighting yet.
Like conceal carry, sure you can do it legally by getting a permit. But you're enemies (Antifa, BLM) aren't, and they get of scotts free. This implies all rights are now privileges, granted to whoever the jews need as pets. This also implies we are already at war, but are still too asleep to know it
Like conceal carry, sure you can do it legally by getting a permit. But you're enemies (Antifa, BLM) aren't, and they get of scotts free. This implies all rights are now privileges, granted to whoever the jews need as pets. This also implies we are already at war, but are still too asleep to know it
(post is archived)