![Celebrity [509x640 - 50KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/wbKY5q.jpg){kind=link}
fascists.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy, which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.
is using it correctly. Not all fascism is good.
ultranationalism
That is a good point. Considering they are anti-nationalists. You could say their 'nation' is replaced by ultra-globalism and it still works.
That certainly is the Jewish textbook definition of fascism.
It also seems like how every monarchy and empire since the dawn of history operated.
Do you know how things were in the 3rd Reich under the NSDAP or do just know what the Jews told you about it?
" forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society"
Ever live among the Amish? They are regimented and there is suppression of the opposition. Are they evil "fascists'?
Whenever I mention the authoritarian aspect of fascism people get defensive of the Nazis. I don't have a problem with the Nazis. What Hitler was doing, he was doing for the people of Germany.
You take issue with suppression of opposition. Is that not what the Sturmabteilung did in the 20s and 30s? Are you saying the Night of the Long Knives did not happen? What about the history of the Reichstag Fire Decree. These are all things to consider.
I don't denounce these things as evil. It was what had to be done to free Germany of a cancer, and I would consider it "forcible suppression of opposition".
Are they evil "fascists'
I never said all fascists were evil. I said not all fascists are good.
(post is archived)