Every single post and comment "he" has made is composed entirely of the one word 'indeed'. If you had a conversation with him which was deleted, well there is no proof of that in his account history so it's not verifiable by anyone, including you. Given that, any person who behaves exactly like a bot account is essentially the same as a bot account. It's not novelty- it's spam. If this 'account' was posting CP or leftist garbage, would you be defending it? What if it was posting low effort content (which it is) in order to slide and hide legit content, would you defend that as well? Think about the reasons why you have for not calling it out and then apply it to the two questions I just asked you. Spam is spam but sometimes it's also subversion. I think this account has crossed over that line.
is where the conversation happened. You can believe it or not, I don’t really care.
I never defended him, just clarified that it’s not a bot. But, to me free speech means you can say the same word over and over if you want.
And sliding and hiding posts? When are you ever going to search for a post using only the word “indeed”? That idea applied to that day when everyone started making posts titled indeed, but that only lasted a few hours
But, to me free speech means you can say the same word over and over if you want.
But free speech also means saying things that are considered incitement of violence which is restricted here on Poal. Same with CP. There are not true free speech sites on the internet.
Free speech can be weaponized. Allowing this kind of novelty account to do what it is doing will make Poal rot.
Saying “indeed” isn’t illegal. The other things you mentioned are.
How is this worse than boekanr flooding the front page with similar quality memes and choosing one word from the meme to be the title? Completely low effort, just memes, 5-8+ per day.
How is one novelty account going to make poal rot? You can see even in this thread several people have blocked him and they completely forgot he even existed. Poal isn’t rotting for them
(post is archived)