![Greatest cope of all time goes to dilbert cuck. We weren't just guessing. The russia hoax ended when the impeachment hoax began which ended when covid began (all 3 seriously within 36 hours direct relay to the next). Doesn't take a genius to know the third one is a hoax and to not take the vaxx. [720x1201 - 123KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/KY3Hn8.jpg){kind=link}
I have a legal background and I'd never heard of a company being given immunity like this, which told me they already knew their product was unsafe.
Fun fact: Vaccine manufacturers have zero liability for any of their vaccines in the modern day, mostly because all of them are pushed onto young children, which confers the same zero liability status as the EUA does.
And while real vaccines aren't as deadly as the poison gene therapy, they're still fucking terrible and kill and maim tons of people. The taxpayer is on the hook for all those injuries and deaths in the Vaccine Settlement Court. The companies that manufacture them never pay a dime.
Fun fact: Vaccine manufacturers have zero liability for any of their vaccines in the modern day, mostly because all of them are pushed onto young children, which confers the same zero liability status as the EUA does.
And just to rephrase this for the benefit of others: This is the reason why Pfizer is pushing the vax on kids so hard, and why the FDA-approved Comirnaty is nowhere to be seen: Until Comirnaty is approved for kids, it's not covered under the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and they would be liable for vaccine injury. The 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act kicks in as soon as Comirnaty is approved for kids, granting legal immunity for the vaccine regardless of who receives it. Pfizer knows just how harmful the vax is. They don't dare give Comirnaty out until they are granted legal immunity.
The taxpayer is on the hook for all those injuries and deaths in the Vaccine Settlement Court.
And those thinking they'll get compensation from the vaccine court are delusional. The stats are something like only 2% of those who file claims with the court receive any compensation. They'll say the injury was not from vaccine, that people do get myocarditis and pericarditis, it's just something that happens, and how do you prove to their satisfaction that the vax was the cause?
Pfizer knows just how harmful the vax is. They don't dare give Comirnaty out until they are granted legal immunity.
So what are they currently giving out that gives them immunity?
Even funner fact: They lose their liability protection in the case of fraud or gross negligence. It'd be pretty easy to prove fraud against all the mRNA poison these days. Unfortunately, no one in the jewdicial system will allow it.
I have a legal background and I'd never heard of a company being given immunity like this
This had happened many times before with vaccines specifically. They are all just as suspect as these new gene therapy shots.
I think the lack of accountability for any adverse affects is a red flag like anyone else here does.
However, there is a crucial piece that seems to be missing in everyone’s synopsis around here.
At the time this all began, the drug companies were told/asked by Trump to speed up production of the vax. Obviously, the government removed a lot of hurdles in terms of regulations to facilitate “operation warp speed” otherwise it couldn’t have happened so quickly. But part of that deal was that the drug companies would only agree to it provided that they wouldn’t be held liable. Can you blame them really? Think about it. They’re being told to disregard a host of otherwise normal safety protocols in order to facilitate a faster time to market, so of course they know that disregarding those protocols carries an an added amount of liability..so of course they would require that liability to be removed…it makes good business sense to do so.
That said, I’m not a fan of big pharma nor am I vaxxed myself. I don’t trust this thing for the same reasons you all don’t. But I also don’t think we can just gloss over some of these things or make certain assumptions, ie “they knew from the beginning that the vax is dangerous”…
I think it’s highly possible that they didn’t know if it was going to be dangerous or not..because the only way to really know would be years of testing…which they were being told not to do…what incentive would they have to bypass normal testing protocols if they would also be held liable for potential ill effects of bypassing those protocols?
I don’t like it anymore than you. But Trump ascertained that this was something that the pharmas would have to be given if they were going to do what Trump asked of them.
(post is archived)