WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Shit as soon as McAfee heard of covid EXISTING he tweeted "do not under any circumstances take the vaccine!"

It isn't a guess

Shit by the time the vaxx came out we had witnessed more hoaxes and normal people wanted nothing to do with kikes niggers or faggots

Shit as soon as McAfee heard of covid EXISTING he tweeted "do not under any circumstances take the vaccine!" It isn't a guess Shit by the time the vaxx came out we had witnessed more hoaxes and normal people wanted nothing to do with kikes niggers or faggots

(post is archived)

[–] 15 pts

What a faggot. I've never seen this level of cope.

[–] 2 pts

He was wrong so sought to justify how others were right when he wasn't without him actually taking ownership

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] 13 pts

I'm not that smart. But I, along with others, accurately laid out every step of the "emergency power" flex that has happened since the first breath of "2 weeks". It's not a guess. It has been telegraphed for decades.

[–] 5 pts

Exactly. Dilbertfag is a fucking moron and is on some serious copium here.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

I wouldn't say a moron but a boomer and most of them have huge blinders on to a bunch of problems they have been programmed to overlook. They are operating within the frame of reference for a country/society that doesn't exist anymore.

[–] [deleted] 10 pts

My decision to not take the vax was simple: its efficacy was not demonstrated to my satisfaction, and the fact that vaccine companies and anyone in the chain were given immunity from liability is a huge moral hazard. Pair that with the record-breaking speed with which it was developed (lota of corners being cut) and the experimental nature of the mrna technology, not taking the drug right away was a no-brainer. At that point I already 'survived' covid for over a year. I could wait another three, six, twelve or more months until more data was available.

It would take a lot to convince me to take the drug under such circumstances and they didn't even come close. The only way one would take it under such circumstances would be if they weren't thinking for themselves but outsourced the decision to the scientists or government officials. That's exactly what Scott did. Trust the science, lol.

[–] 3 pts (edited )

One more analysis that is VERY on point. Your analysis allows for verification and does not dismiss all the previous science.

In my case, I MUST admin, that I am not weighing heavily towards becoming an antivaxxer. If you look at the behaviour of the professional class and recognize that they are ONLY human and that all humans suffer from the kind of myopic self congratulatory world view on display currently, we can can not only project that analytical stick into the future but into the past as well.

How much of our our previous understanding of vaxxinations are actually true vs how much of what we know is actually just a cover up story for a set of issues going on at a layer below us?

For example, I have read that polio was caused by heavy metals used in pesticides at the beginning of the pesticide revolution and that polio did not go away as a result of the polio vaccine but the end of the use of heavy metals in pesticides. Over the last 50 years we went from like 2 vaccine shots for babies to now something like 20 or so? I don't even know what to believe any more as a result, although, I can imagine systems of verfication that would allow us to catalogue degrees of truth about each claim (including the polio claims).

[+] [deleted] 3 pts
[–] 0 pt

Plus it's not even a vaccine, it's a DNA altering (despite that they claim it only affects RNA, it actually causes reverse transcription into DNA) gene therapy.

it actually causes reverse transcription into DNA

I've seen studies that found reverse transcription of genes from the virus, but none that attributed the cause to vaccines. I'm sure it happens, I just think it's extremely rare, though it's hard to be certain how rare reverse transcription is or how harmful it is when it happens.

[–] 0 pt

Most of the people who would conduct studies are complicit in the poison gene therapy, so inevitably there will be few or no studies showing evidence of reverse transcription by the vaccine. But by the nature of how the mRNA gene therapy works it's likely to cause reverse transcription, probably in most cases, which means that people who take the poison are potentially going to have their cells generating toxic spike proteins for life if that happens to them. Maybe it doesn't happen in all cases, but if they're taking 5, 10, 20 boosters, eventually it will and then they're even more fucked.

[–] 0 pt

My decision to not take the vax was simple: its efficacy was not demonstrated to my satisfaction

Which should vary based on the risk it counters. If you have a 0.00001% chance of dying of some disease, it's going to be hard to justify any drug, no matter how safe.

Don't forget all the suppression of non-"vaccine" approaches like hydroxychloroquine. That was a big flag that they were guiding everyone to the vaxx.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Which should vary based on the risk it counters. If you have a 0.00001% chance of dying of some disease, it's going to be hard to justify any drug, no matter how safe.

Funny you should mention that number, roughly 1 in 10 million. Tetanus vaccines is one example that has been brought to my attention recently. Tetanus has 30 cases per year in the United States:

https://www.cdc.gov/tetanus/images/tetanus-chart-1947-2018.png

US population is about 300 million, so dividing 30 by that number gives us 0.00001% as the chance of being infected (not even dying). And the chance of ME getting infected is much less since I don't work on a farm or in construction where I might come in contact with rust.

And yet, when I went to my doctor for a checkup, what's the thing he asked? DiD yOu GeT yOuR tEtAnUs BoOsTeR???

Fucking clown world.

[–] 1 pt

And to answer my next question, "how much is that tetanus number reduced by the tetanus vaccine?", .

[–] 8 pts

Master persuader has a comeback https://pic8.co/sh/bb4ZcY.jpeg

[–] 6 pts

One of the purported side effects of the vax is cognitive decline resulting in uncontrollable emotional outbursts. ...next comes the crying ...and the screaming ...and the dying.

In the future, if any of those smug bastards that took the experimental jab get into an argument with you, your first reply should be, "Look, I know you've been vaccinated and you're no longer responsible for yourself..." That will drive those human pincushions absolutely batshit crazy.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

The gamma lashes out when his carefully crafted image falls apart.

[–] 1 pt

It’s been fun to watch the melting down

[–] [deleted] 6 pts

I used to follow him and listen to his odcasts for a time. But then it became clear that he was a propagandist, whether witting or unwitting. In either case his goal was not to seek the truth but to persuade his audience. The most charitable explanation is that he was or is being fed incorrect info that he dissiminates to the public. The less charitable explanation is that he's doing the propagandizing willingly and deliberately.

[–] 5 pts

When a multi-billionaire eugenicist gives a speech on the need for population reduction through the use of vaccines and 9 years later is promoting mandatory vaccines for the entire planet for a new pandemic, it's not "lucky" if you decided not to take it.

[–] 5 pts

lmao, it was "safe and effective" there was literally no data that could temporally exist to make that judgement unless they mean its safe for the time period that it has currently been released. for a technology that has never been used on humans with huge and terrible animal testing results and they can say it is safe and effective in the long term? that is physically impossible you would have to time travel to know the long term effects since its has never been tried before. point this out and you are a "conspiracy theorist"

[–] 4 pts

In some small way, he's right, we don't know. We extrapolate based on the minimal testing and the fact that this technology has never worked before. We can safely assume that it's a bad thing.

Now that it's had some runtime and we can see that bad things are happening, we add them to the data set and can say we see now that it's looking bad.

It's the same with a software update for my computer or a medication for my body. Unless you can prove to me that it has a known benefit without a really bad side effect, I'm going to wait. In this case, waiting helped as we can see the injections aren't worth the saline they're made with.

[–] 4 pts

I'm the furthest from what is called an "Anti-Vaxer" I just finished decades of military service, I received several shots/immunizations every year. I did resist the Anthrax shots until they released a safer version. Now, I've gotten it, and many boosters. So, I'm clearly not an Anti-Vaxxer!

However, when this mRNA Shot was released I scoffed, delayed and never took the shot. Nothing about it seemed safe or effective. If it had been FDA approved and shown to be effective I would have taken it.

Its not safe, its far from safe. It is not effective against Covid-19. The lies being spread to convince people to take this jab are loud and obvious. I've never seen propaganda being spread at this level. That alone has my guard up, I could go on but I will trust the science.

The science I've seen so far concludes this shot is dangerous, unnecessary and ineffective (for its advertised purpose...)

[–] 1 pt

I've never seen propaganda being spread at this level.

You've probably seen it before but not realized that's what it was. This type of psyop has been going on for ages about all sorts of topics.

Also the real vaccines are not really safe either, and kill or maim thousands per year. Vaccines, per se, are not the problem, their manufacturers are. For instance, there's no reason to put mercury and aluminum as a preservative in vaccines, but all modern vaccines contain both. Mercury and aluminum have a synergistic toxicity, not to mention being toxic on their own. The aluminum will probably do limited damage before being expelled, but with mercury which stays in your body and accumulates, there is a knock-on effect.

Personally I'd suggest, now that you're out of the military, not taking any vaccines.

[–] 0 pt

I hear you, I skipped the flu shot this year. I just don’t trust them anymore. I realized it a long time ago, when we got sick after the flu shot, many times. And we still caught the flu anyway! Perhaps that experience made it so easy for me to not only turn down this So called “Covid” vaccine but to say hell no and this is the hill I’m willing to die on. Fortunately, the vaxxed people agree with me and think I’m going to die. But what has me perplexed is that now they believe that I am a threat to them because I’m not vaxxed? That is crazy thought, what is wrong with them?

[–] 3 pts

I'm working on a dickbert cartoon mocking his melt down

[–] 2 pts

The funniest part of all the pandemic punditry is that our data was so bad, only the people who interpreted it incorrectly made good predictions

What a faggot. Can’t admit he done fucked up even when he clearly fucked up.

We didn’t “incorrectly interpret” the data, we knew it was complete bullshit from the beginning.

Load more (14 replies)