One more analysis that is VERY on point. Your analysis allows for verification and does not dismiss all the previous science. In my case, I MUST admin, that I am not weighing heavily towards becoming an antivaxxer. If you look at the behaviour of the professional class and recognize that they are ONLY human and that all humans suffer from the kind of myopic self congratulatory world view on display currently, we can can not only project that analytical stick into the future but into the past as well. How much of our our previous understanding of vaxxinations are actually true vs how much of what we know is actually just a cover up story for a set of issues going on at a layer below us? For example, I have read that polio was caused by heavy metals used in pesticides at the beginning of the pesticide revolution and that polio did not go away as a result of the polio vaccine but the end of the use of heavy metals in pesticides. Over the last 50 years we went from like 2 vaccine shots for babies to now something like 20 or so? I don't even know what to believe any more as a result, although, I can imagine systems of verfication that would allow us to catalogue degrees of truth about each claim (including the polio claims).