Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Shit as soon as McAfee heard of covid EXISTING he tweeted "do not under any circumstances take the vaccine!"

It isn't a guess

Shit by the time the vaxx came out we had witnessed more hoaxes and normal people wanted nothing to do with kikes niggers or faggots

Shit as soon as McAfee heard of covid EXISTING he tweeted "do not under any circumstances take the vaccine!" It isn't a guess Shit by the time the vaxx came out we had witnessed more hoaxes and normal people wanted nothing to do with kikes niggers or faggots

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (69).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Which should vary based on the risk it counters. If you have a 0.00001% chance of dying of some disease, it's going to be hard to justify any drug, no matter how safe.

Funny you should mention that number, roughly 1 in 10 million. Tetanus vaccines is one example that has been brought to my attention recently. Tetanus has 30 cases per year in the United States:

https://www.cdc.gov/tetanus/images/tetanus-chart-1947-2018.png

US population is about 300 million, so dividing 30 by that number gives us 0.00001% as the chance of being infected (not even dying). And the chance of ME getting infected is much less since I don't work on a farm or in construction where I might come in contact with rust.

And yet, when I went to my doctor for a checkup, what's the thing he asked? DiD yOu GeT yOuR tEtAnUs BoOsTeR???

Fucking clown world.

[–] • 1 pt

And to answer my next question, "how much is that tetanus number reduced by the tetanus vaccine?", .