>I know this is a lost effort because you are not able to look at this objectively or change your mind in the slightest, but maybe someone else will. Cool. Start with an ad hom because you know you're going to present false information and you'll get that out of the way by attacking me. >EV vs ICE pollution Let’s get this straight https://youtu.be/aHWM4jNVp_w Cool? I can find a video that says (((global warming))) / (((climate change))) is caused by humans. I can find a video that says oil / gas/ petroleum / carbon energy is created by dead animals and plants. We both know both of those claims are 100% false. So you having a video that claims otherwise, when studies have shown that (((EV)))s pollute more than ICE, I kind don't care. >New York Times best selling author is WRONG about EVs https://youtu.be/ai-zYGts4eo?t=483 >>point of contention being smart phone production was increased a larger rate than the contended video claimed The contended video was about resources, not products. It's not hard to increase the production of a product 2x 3x 4x 5x ... in 10 years. That counter point is wrong and smoothbrained. He didn't prove the claim (can't keep up with lithium "production", sic: mining) His "plastics" comparison is more ludicrous than that though. Plastics aren't "raw materials" like he claims. They're products, they're made from GUESS WHAT?!?!?! Petroleum. >EVs are first cars >>But on average EV owners have more than one car. Thus "status symbol". His study; >US households with electric vehicles while having 2 vehicles: 46% His study is wrong. 46% of two car households do not own an EV. I'm not going to finish watching, but from your start time each of his points is wrong as he claims they're right. I have no interest in hearing this soycuck push (((EV))) lies and (((studies))). >New study claiming electric cars are dirtier than diesel debunked https://electrek.co/2019/04/22/study-electric-cars-dirtier-diesel-debunked/ (((electrek))) >debooooooooooooooooooonked Just stop. >A global comparison of the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of combustion engine and electric passenger cars https://theicct.org/publication/a-global-comparison-of-the-life-cycle-greenhouse-gas-emissions-of-combustion-engine-and-electric-passenger-cars/ Again, this is a (((study))) like those that claim (((racism is violence))) or that (((niggers are as smart as Europeans))) etc. This type of study is performed backward then the data is picked that fits the chosen narrative. >fruits are healthy >>vegetables are healthy >>>eggs are bad >>>>red meat is bad >>>>>pork is bad >>>>>>bugs are good >>>>>>>marijuana is safe >>>>>>>>men can be women >>>>>>>>>women can be men >>>>>>>>>>jews have high IQs So no, despite your required (((AD hom))), your sources are lacking, do nothing to dispute the truth and are completely dishonest.