You're disingenuous, not observant. The US isn't 'browner' than it used to be. With the exception of the black population, there were only nominal numbers of non-European populations present in the United States. The only way you can get from 90% share to 48% under 16, while simultaneously growing your population by over 35 Million is via two rounds of amnesty and to be outbred by orders of magnitude - not slight variance according to race. You also don't get to hide behind White Hispanic or Non-Hispanic White. Those are terms designed specifically to obscure the consideration. White is not Hispanic though increasingly it is said that "Hispanics can be any race" they choose. See this illustrative, but hopelessly chronologically misleading USA Today slide graphic: https://www.gannett-cdn.com/GDContent/2014/diversity-map/index.html "The thing with demographic trends is that they change" No, they change when you're experiencing a replacement and during mass migratory events but according to racial and ethnic lines -- they didn't change much at all in the United States for over 150 years... They stayed pretty stable. Demographics represent the make-up of a society. In this case we're talking about South and Central American versus the European breeds. In Europe there was a couple thousand years of interaction, ideological development, social experiences, and philosophic evolution - something like 97% of modern societal advances come from Europe during the past 500 years. So yes, the German, Italian, Englishman, Frenchman, Norwegian, and Pollack all share degrees of social, scientific, and philosophical evolution. The same cannot be said about the history of South and Central America which does not resemble, in any way, a particularly compatible social model, nor does it's fixation on Communism lend itself to the supporting the continuance of the European tradition. You cannot select time slice representations and ignore the global trends and the trends are unequivocal. Most of what I discussed is what constitutes culture and that when the dominant population become Hispanic, so too must the culture change to reflect that. You've seen it loudly and violently on display over the course of the past year. Under the guise of BLM, intersectional identities have rallied around the deconstruction of the History of the United States. Monuments, Holidays, traditions and social expectations are all being recontextualized to be illustrative of what is evil in this world. Indeed, even to acknowledge any of this is tantamount to a hate crime in across half the country. for the rest, you're arguing conversational trivialities. Immigrants overwhelmingly support Democrats for a number of reasons, most notably because they encourage non-assimilation, support unreasonable entitlement programs for immigrants, and have in many cases provided superior financial assistance programs for immigrants - including those here illegally. https://www.thenationalsentinel.com/2019/03/28/study-shows-that-most-immigrants-by-far-vote-for-democrats-gop-future-bleak-without-substantial-new-limits/ https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/8/house-votes-favor-illegal-immigrant-voting/ Beyond that I argued that the case was being made that whiteness is a social problem requiring a societal solution. I argued that once formal majority status has been lost, the leftist will push for stronger and more violent means of addressing the 'white problem' and that the case is similar to the situation that occurred in Russia over one hundred years ago. To this I don't know how to proceed. Every day, there are dozen of articles, studies, news reports building a mountain of brown propaganda espousing the evils of whiteness, that whiteness is a virus, a parasitic condition. Attacks on whites are rising massively -- particularly against women. children, and the elderly. Rage is being fomented across the spectrum, but nowhere more intently that sematic media. I'm not going to litigate jewish over-representation in hollywood, new and traditional media, finance, and pornography but the masses they're filling with hatred are not capable of the rational discrenment necessary to deal with these stimuli in healthy or productive ways. Nonetheless they persist and each and virtually all of them are Jewish. The modern Christian is convinced, utterly convinced of jewish superiority because they have been taught this their entire adult lives -- so much so that they have no problem with hundreds of members of Congress being made to sign loyalty pledges to Israel, for criticism of jewish and israeli political lobbying and legislative priorities to be protected from criticism under antisemitism laws. That private citizens are made to sign anti-bds loyalty pledges as condition of employment is yes... A very direct and troubling illustration of jewish domination of the political right and private sector left. The first one deals with the homegrown problem: https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf The second with the imported problem: https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2009-richwine.pdf It's late and I'm beginning to lose focus. The problem isn't China or Russia or fucking UFO's. Those are distractions, we could deal with them if we set ourselves to do so, China is an adversary of our own creation and post-communist Russia should not be the adversary they are being made to be. The problem we face is unchecked hispanic invasion, jewish control of media and government, and the intentional financial crisis our ruling class has created for us both through over two decades of out of control deficit spending, but also this most recent economic attack potentially related to the great reset corporate movement. good night.