Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

I've spent the past week reading, listening and watching anything I can on White identity (in the mainstream). In near every piece White supremacy is mentioned within the first few sentences. In the remainder of the cases - the focal point is White hate groups. This is discouraging and makes it impossible for us to have a productive conversation regarding White identity.

I am working to sever that conflation so we can have healthy dialogue about the interests of Whites and our beautiful identity - and crack open that Overton window for the sake of the future of my White son.

Please help me protect the interest of Whites and secure a healthy future for our children.

I've spent the past week reading, listening and watching anything I can on White identity (in the mainstream). In near every piece White supremacy is mentioned within the first few sentences. In the remainder of the cases - the focal point is White hate groups. This is discouraging and makes it impossible for us to have a productive conversation regarding White identity. I am working to sever that conflation so we can have healthy dialogue about the interests of Whites and our beautiful identity - and crack open that Overton window for the sake of the future of my White son. Please help me protect the interest of Whites and secure a healthy future for our children.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (61).
[–] • 0 pt

That is a great question.

It is in my son's best interest to be able to have a say at all. The way things are going - this is quickly being stripped of him.

In regard to non-Whites and their say; I believe everyone should have an equal say. On that note, I believe it is in my son's best interest to live in a majority White nation. The way things are going - this is quickly being stripped of him.

Ensuring Whites are able to communicate their perspective, insecurities, successes and everything in between is important for me. I believe the first step is to gain ground on that front.

Please let me know what you think and how I can improve my thought process. I appreciate your engagement!

[–] • 0 pt

You're on the right track, and you should probably keep your current position publicly, however if you think these things out to the logical conclusion you'll probably arrive where the rest of us are.

The left is right about of few things, one of them being the paradox of tolerance. If we allow intolerant ideologies such as liberalism, judaism, communism, islam, to have equal footing in our society they will dominate and destroy us. Same with races who are supremacist. What race is supremacist? Black, hispanics, asians, arabs...all of them.

If they are allowed in our societies at all it must be as second class citizens, explicitly and with no path to equality. Otherwise the paradox of tolerance attaches and our own tolerance destroys us. You are seeing this happen today.

Who is content being a second class citizen aside from a diplomat or import/export business? You're one now and you see that it endangers you and your child. You're working to gain dominance, this is natural and normal, so it should be expected of all groups. Why would a society open itself up to that kind of conflict? Racial or religious diversity is, unequivocally, not a strength.

Furthermore, if you look to the future most non-whites have reached their civilizational peak. Blacks can not progress past mud huts and spears. When separeted from whites they regress. Hispanics can not progress past the wild west. Without whites they are stuck there. IQ is a ceiling and most of the world has reached it's cap. As we are dragged down by diversity quotas we are stuck where we are. If you want a spacefaring future then the entitlement and uncontrolled breeding of populations with sub 100 IQs needs to stop. Only asians are arguably on our level. So why not fully support white supremacy? Is it not objectively the path to the best imaginable future? Why abuse children by forcing them to live as 80 IQ brown people who can't function in modern society? Is that not just objectively evil?

[–] • 1 pt

>The left is right about of few things, one of them being the paradox of tolerance. If we allow intolerant ideologies such as liberalism, judaism, communism, islam, to have equal footing in our society they will dominate and destroy us. Same with races who are supremacist. What race is supremacist? Black, hispanics, asians, arabs...all of them.

You are 100% right, I cover examples of other racial supremacy in the blog linked in this post. It only got 12 views so I don't think many people read it, I need to do better to get the word out. To respond more directly to you, the acceptance of intolerant races is a funny situation. In my experience, virtue signalers rarely think logically and less so about consequence.

>Who is content being a second class citizen aside from a diplomat or import/export business? You're one now and you see that it endangers you and your child. You're working to gain dominance, this is natural and normal, so it should be expected of all groups. Why would a society open itself up to that kind of conflict? Racial or religious diversity is, unequivocally, not a strength.

We can look at Israel adamantly working to keep a jewish majority as not to lose their control. I completely understand that. America is becoming a corpse, pecked at constantly. We are losing what made us great to begin with. I think that something correlates heavily with Western Christian culture. Here's a good article helping to explain downsides of diversity. I love diversity, that's why I want to protect cultures and allow them self determination. Otherwise, you get cesspools of cities with low trust communities and an artificial propping up of "diversity is our strength". Its branding and PR. It's dishonest.

https://archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/

>Furthermore, if you look to the future most non-whites have reached their civilizational peak. Blacks can not progress past mud huts and spears. When separeted from whites they regress. Hispanics can not progress past the wild west. Without whites they are stuck there. IQ is a ceiling and most of the world has reached it's cap. As we are dragged down by diversity quotas we are stuck where we are. If you want a spacefaring future then the entitlement and uncontrolled breeding of populations with sub 100 IQs needs to stop. Only asians are arguably on our level. So why not fully support white supremacy? Is it not objectively the path to the best imaginable future? Why abuse children by forcing them to live as 80 IQ brown people who can't function in modern society? Is that not just objectively evil?

I completely understand where you are coming from, you bring up points I cannot argue with. I know a lot of people would blame Whitey for the lack of progress of other cultures but that's just ignorant. Discussing supremacy, in my opinion, is an easy way for "them" to stop any progress in the movement and quickly, emotionally tie it to all of the boogeyman the ADL (etc) echo. For the sake of promoting a positive White identity and making headway in giving us an actual voice in racial discussions - it is important for me to not focus on that topic.

Thank you for the interesting dialogue.