Your argument, and more to my point the common arguments that I've heard on this topic don't seem to follow a straight line and just don't hold up in my opinion. I actually did entertain the idea that it might be completely fake when people started talking about it not being isolated, but the more I read y'all's arguments and sources there were too many weak points.
Can you explain how a sequence can be made without an isolated sample? Think of the sequence like a movie. Like "Schindler's List." The movie itself is supposed to be a representation of something in reality. The fact that the holohoax didn't happen make that sequence bullshit. Why do you trust the sequence without an isolated specimen?
You need neither sequence nor isolation to prove bacteria exists in a petri dish. That's an example I know we're talking about a virus here.
Isolation and sequencing of the dna/rna whatever involved - I don't have any reason to belive that's necessary for it to exist. We studied lots of diseases well before we had the technology to do that.
Plus, I've had covid. Direct observation is pretty convincing.
Lol. Covid isn't bacteria. It really isn't.
You don't have any reason? How about the fact that it's the process used in literally every virus case to prove it exists.
And you had Covid? How do you know? Did you test positive on the pcr test? The test that has nothing to do with Covid but is actually an inaccurate test that tests for antibodies from the coronavirus family?
"Muh, but I was sick." You had a cold and are too damn dumb to put 2 and 2 together.
(post is archived)