You're right. My argument is about the word. I don't know why you couldn't understand that. I was saying they CHOSE coronavirus as the family because of the word. Not the shape of the made up virus. I'm not saying the coronavirus family doesn't exist. I'm not saying the family of virus wasn't named after its shape. I'm saying the fake virus they made up, Sars-CoV-2, does not exist. The lie that it belongs the the coronavirus family is a choice the perpetrators of this hoax made.
Your argument, and more to my point the common arguments that I've heard on this topic don't seem to follow a straight line and just don't hold up in my opinion. I actually did entertain the idea that it might be completely fake when people started talking about it not being isolated, but the more I read y'all's arguments and sources there were too many weak points.
Can you explain how a sequence can be made without an isolated sample? Think of the sequence like a movie. Like "Schindler's List." The movie itself is supposed to be a representation of something in reality. The fact that the holohoax didn't happen make that sequence bullshit. Why do you trust the sequence without an isolated specimen?
You need neither sequence nor isolation to prove bacteria exists in a petri dish. That's an example I know we're talking about a virus here.
Isolation and sequencing of the dna/rna whatever involved - I don't have any reason to belive that's necessary for it to exist. We studied lots of diseases well before we had the technology to do that.
Plus, I've had covid. Direct observation is pretty convincing.
(post is archived)