Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Keep in mind that these big tech faggots have been developing AI applications via machine learning for over 30 years now. They haven't been "surprised" by anything that has come out of the public testing phase.

AI is not regulated in any way. In comes faggotgpt to get the entire public buzzing about AGI TM and all the "cool stuff it can do".

Now that enough attention is on the project, they are starting to call out AI as being "dangerous". Why is it dangerous? Do they say it is because of the way corporations and government will use it to abuse people? NO. It's "dangerous" because of the way the people are using it.

In come the cries to "stop AI development" which will more than likely result in the government convening "emergency" councils to address the "growing problem of rouge AI"

And bam! The government gets laws passed, with much public support, to take cotnro of any AI project made available to the public or commercial space.

Keep in mind that these big tech faggots have been developing AI applications via machine learning for over 30 years now. They haven't been "surprised" by anything that has come out of the public testing phase. AI is not regulated in any way. In comes faggotgpt to get the entire public buzzing about AGI ^^TM and all the "cool stuff it can do". Now that enough attention is on the project, they are starting to call out AI as being "dangerous". Why is it dangerous? Do they say it is because of the way corporations and government will use it to abuse people? NO. It's "dangerous" because of the way *the people* are using it. In come the cries to "stop AI development" which will more than likely result in the government convening "emergency" councils to address the "growing problem of rouge AI" And bam! The government gets laws passed, with much public support, to take cotnro of any AI project made available to the public or commercial space.

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

"Ethical and moral use of AI" - a bunch of horseshit that basically says "let us micromanage everything you do with this technology, goy!"

[–] • 3 pts

I think you're spot on. Cuckgpt is going to turn into either chinanumbawangpt or kikegpt as soon as 'someone starts controlling it'.

[–] • 2 pts

Now that enough attention is on the project, they are starting to call out AI as being "dangerous". Why is it dangerous? Do they say it is because of the way corporations and government will use it to abuse people? NO. It's "dangerous" because of the way the people are using it

They're calling for a halt of anything past gpt-4's level of sophistication. The people don't have access to anything a tenth of that. It's only corporations who would be affected if there was a pause, which there won't be because governments want to abuse people.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

They're calling for a halt of anything past gpt-4's level of sophistication

By what metric? In the open letter they do not indicate by what metric an AI system is considered to be "more powerful than gpt-4"

They did not use the term "sophisticaled"

[–] • 1 pt

Everyone that is calling for a pause is currently not making money from AI...

[–] • 3 pts

That's it's only use at this stage, making someone money. It sure as hell isn't making anyone's lives better.

[–] • 1 pt

.

.

[–] • 1 pt

I can't wait until Roko's lizard gets elon

[–] • 1 pt

It's because the 'wrong' people may be able to use it. You need a AI use license now or you will automatically be jailed for using or creating fake Hitler.

The box is open and there is no closing it. Adapt or fail.

[–] • 0 pt

Exactly!

Comments - A Third Talk With ChatGPT - by Spartacus | Poal: Say what you want. https://poal.co/s/conspiracy/626705

[–] • 0 pt

Shall Not Be Infringed