Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

  • remove space between google and .com
[Source](https://patents.google .com/patent/US10337841B2/en) - remove space between google and .com [Archives #1](https://archive.li/Bihil) [Archives #2](https://web.archive.org/web/20230823092226/https://patents.google.com/patent/US10337841B2/en)

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

Considering the scale of Maui fire, it's clear that it wasn't made by some retarded Antifa/BLM fags or man made at all.

Here's what I managed to find on the topic, looks like Direct Energy Weapons (DEWs) and other types of Energy Weapons have been in use and development for long time:

These weapons have not been used on protestors to date but are actively in development for military as well as crowd-control purposes, and they are being marketed to law enforcement as well as military agencies.

The first prototype, Active Denial System I, underwent some testing and was deployed in Afghanistan in 2010, but was recalled a few months later and has never been used since then against enemy combatants in military settings. Since 2011, the updated ADS II and the Silent Guardian, a smaller mobile device, have been demonstrated on military personnel and volunteers. The Silent Guardian is marked directly to civilian law enforcement agencies and other security providers.

https://phr.org/our-work/resources/health-impacts-of-crowd-control-weapons-directed-energy-devices/ https://archive.ph/HgKGG

  • "Health Impacts of Crowd-Control Weapons: Acoustic Weapons"

Sound amplifiers have been used for centuries, but this technology was weaponized for crowd-control purposes in the early 1990s. Specialty devices that are able to project loud sounds over very long ranges were first used by the U.S. military in Iraq in 2004. Since the 1990s, the U.S. military and private companies have also researched infrasonic devices which could have effects at very low frequencies that might not be heard by the human ear.

https://phr.org/our-work/resources/health-impacts-of-crowd-control-weapons-acoustic-weapons/ https://archive.ph/xfpXu

[–] • 1 pt

Considering the scale of Maui fire, it's clear that it wasn't made by some retarded Antifa/BLM fags or man made at all.

Can you explain what you mean by "considering the scale..." part? What does scale have to do with the cause? Starting a fire is easy and starting the fire in multiple places is easy too. Why would the scale of the overall fire rule out conventional arson methods and only point towards directed energy weapons? Just the same, when you light a fire in a fireplace or wood stove or BBQ grill, do you constantly keep putting matches/a blowtorch/ignitor fluid on the fire after it is lit? a DEW would not be continuously used once the fire is going so all those "anomalies" with the blue colored objects, trees burning from the inside out, car wheels melting and trees not burning at all are all the result of the fire itself not the ignition method. No one seems to have realized that part. Once the fire is lit, the fire does the damage. No one will explain how the fire behaved differently after it was started. That's an important thing to discuss yet no one is going there. Why?

[–] • 0 pt

The idea that they would be able to successfully pull of this operation and not get at least one of them arrested is what gets me to think it was more likely DEW were used. What's true, no one knows for now and after all we are in .

[–] • 1 pt

The idea that they would be able to successfully pull of this operation and not get at least one of them arrested is what gets me to think it was more likely DEW were used.

I get that, but I can't help but think that at least two things are getting in the way of the idea that they would get arrested for arson. First off it seems that no one in that community was up late and/or outside during the time of the fire approaching because you think that someone would have noticed that and thought to warn their neighbors at the least. How were so many people caught off guard from a fire of that scale? Seems really odd to me.

Secondly...arrested by whom? The people who would be doing the arresting are the same people who get told to stand down when their handlers and masters are up to something evil. The arsonists wouldn't get arrested because they are on the same team as those who would be arresting them. It's easy not to get caught when you have a free pass to do their master's bidding.

With those two points and also knowing what I know about lasers/masers and other microwave/EMF devices, I don't buy the DEW angle at all. Why use something like that when gasoline, a lighter and a free pass for mayhem are much easier and cheaper? It's easier to explain away too since (((they))) could always blame (((climate change))) or (((drought))) or (((White supremacy))) or (((antisemitism))) for the reason White terrorists started the fires if people ask too many questions. DEWs are just weapons of mass distraction that are brought up to get people going in the wrong direction instead of finding the shabbos goyim minions who are likely behind this.

[–] • 1 pt

It was more the Lahaina fires than the Maui fires. Go to google maps and look at the street view of all the neighborhoods wiped out by the fire. They are one step above Brazilian favelas made of teak in the 1950-60's...no building codes, every backyard has at least 2 tiny homes touching the neighbors roof. 5 cars in every driveway.

cut to the houses that didn't burn...all modern builds, landscaped, house center of the property, roofs not touching your neighbors.

DEW exist, but hiring or tasking criminals to arson is infinitely cheaper and more likely.

[–] • 1 pt

Directed energy weapon Abstract A directed energy weapon includes a number of laser units, each including a fiber laser generating an output beam with a power of at least 1 kW from a fiber, an objective lens arrangement for focusing the output beam into a focused beam directed towards a target, and a fine adjustment mechanism for adjusting a direction of the focused beam. A beam deflector arrangement is deployed to deflect a portion of the focused beam from each laser unit as a deflected beam in a direction in predefined relation to a direction of the focused beam. An angle sensing unit generates an output indicative of a current direction of said deflected beam for each of said laser units. A controller actuates the fine adjustment mechanisms based on the output from the angle sensing unit to maintain a desired relative alignment between directions of the focused beams.

That definition from the patent is pretty minimal. According to that definition, I have access to two directed energy weapons. They are both large laser CNC machines with power outputs of over 2KW and have a focusing system, beam alignment in coarse and fine and optical systems that allow the beam to be sensed and deflected for safety and performance uses. While 2KW beam output is capable of going through steel and aluminum, the conditions needed to do that are quite specific. They are not good weapons because of those conditions so it's odd that the specifications of the patent are so minimal. Patents are generalized for the most part so the existence of such a patent really don't give away what is actually possible or actually being actively worked on. Soooo, patents don't really mean much in the grand scheme of things.

Also, this is rather specific to fiber lasers which is NOT what platforms like the ABL are. It's kind of describing an apple where the ABL is a rack of ribs. It's not a perfect alignment to what laser-based weapons actually are. Fiber lasers != chemical lasers

[–] • 1 pt

And cohencidentally (as Fumduck mentioned above) it's an Israeli company that's behind.