>Au revoir monsieur l'ambassadeur.
It's the contracted form of "au revoir monsieur le ambassadeur", but the non-conctracted form is gramatically false, so there's only the contracted form...
>>Au revoir monsieur l'ambassadeur.
It's the contracted form of "au revoir monsieur **le** ambassadeur", but the non-conctracted form is gramatically false, so there's only the contracted form...
If I would have spoken it, it would have come out correctly. When I write anything in French now, it is painfully obvious that I don't think in French at all, and were it any longer than 4 words, I'm sure you would hear the English thoughts forming the sentence and basically translating word for word. A great example of use it or lose it.
If I would have spoken it, it would have come out correctly. When I write anything in French now, it is painfully obvious that I don't think in French at all, and were it any longer than 4 words, I'm sure you would hear the English thoughts forming the sentence and basically translating word for word. A great example of use it or lose it.
So you're now like le Sheboon?
So you're now like le Sheboon?
That would be "la" sheboon. Even if I suffered a head injury and lost 100 IQ points, I'd still be smarter, more polite and care about people around me enough to not commit any crimes.
That would be "la" sheboon. Even if I suffered a head injury and lost 100 IQ points, I'd still be smarter, more polite and care about people around me enough to not commit any crimes.
(post is archived)