WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

543

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Right? c'mon hold the dude accountable for deciding that "it might get you fired" is now the censorship threshold.

And of course SBBH is all over but never addressing the topic at hand, just spamming

[–] 5 pts

They're more than spammers. I'm fairly certain they're the ones flooding voat with leftist news sites first thing in the morning.

[–] 0 pt

I’ve noticed that too.

Voat looks more and more like faggit.

[–] 3 pts

censorship threshold.

I'm not sure how flagging something is censorship. It doesn't prevent you from seeing it. Some argue it is an incentive to view it.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Using specific words now gets you flagged. That doesn't seem like a soft step towards censorship to you?

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Might be a step in that direction, but I can still read a flagged post if I choose. Slippery slope, I guess.

I'm not sure I understand the logic to begin with. I would think that if you could get in trouble for the content of a particular message, but it's OK to be goofing off reading "safe" stuff? Aren't they paying people to be working on company stuff when they're at work?

[+] [deleted] 2 pts