Yeah, it stood out (credit where credit is due) as a good way to overcome the "free speech about everything everywhere, even SBBH gore in TradWives, no moderators ever at all" vs. "specialty subs can take action to emphasize the content they want to see" debate
I mean thats always been the policy here, I'll give them credit its not a bad idea, but being able to vote out moderators seems like it could be abused.
E.g: Faggit slowly replaced all the mods from what they call controversial subs that don’t fit into their narrative with paid staffers who make sure real news get filtered out.
Yup.
Yeah like Owl said it seems like a good deal of complexity and ripe for loopholes, but I am glad they're trying out a new idea. It either amplifies SBBH or solves them.
Forgive me for thinking so, but somehow I don't think anything that happens on voat will solve SBBH, their brigading and corrupting.
(post is archived)