>Do they contain gaming artwork? If so, that's gaming related by definition.
>I don't like his content, I like free speech. He's not easy to defend, which makes it more important to do so.
This quote describes exactly why this is so fucked up. It's just another step on the slippery slope of reddit style censorship.
and whatever happened to goats figuring it out on their own, with "block user", upvoting the content they like to see, and this oh-so-great "RULES" system that could have been enforced locally instead of Puttler having a tantrum at SBBH's behest?
I wonder if the financial backer has something to do with this. Why would putts make complete turn around on his beliefs towards sub rules and dealing with other users?
Something smells fishy over at voat.
Certainly a possibility... wouldn't be the first time that strings came attached
(post is archived)