Honestly, if a woman isn't married and pumping out kids by 20-25 there's something very broken with her. Extreme red flag. These days it's literally a minimum of three kids required to ensure continuation of your genetic line. If they are not hitting that number by their late twenties they are failures as a women. If she's divorced and into her thirties, greater than 80% chance she's a broken, tormented, hypergamous, predator, feminist. Basically a loser only good for sex. She should be treated as such. If she's single and unmarried and in her later twenties, she's likely a used up alcoholic whore attempting to predate upon men to extract wealth so she can become the divorced predator above. Basically if a women isn't married and creating a family no later than 25 she's likely extremely broken and a low value and a worthless mate. I see why Jews push women to invest in college (delay them and create financial burden on a useless degree). I completely understand why many ancient cultures declare women old maids by 25. Because they are. Effectively only good for sex after this point. As Shakespeare makes clear, they become toxic shrews. A women's capital is her youth, appearance, fertility, and ability to nest (home making). All of which, save the last, are peaking at 16-20. Maybe slightly later if they have truly exceptional genetics. But it's all downhill after that. Whereas men's value is just starting to grow at 25. This is why marriage of younger woman to older men (16-20f to 25-30m; and the young female age ensured virginity) was once the healthy norm, because it's good for everyone (men and women) and society. Feminism is a Jewish cancer. Any metric which confirms infection is a major red flag.