Its ok when WE make money off it. Not You using it for "free".
If any of this can be considered "fair use" then all piracy is fair use as long as you are not making money from it.
Archive: https://archive.today/Kpeae
From the post:
>A group of prominent intellectual property law professors has weighed in on the high-stakes AI copyright battle between several authors and Meta. In an amicus brief, the scholars argue that using copyrighted content as training data can be considered fair use under U.S. copyright law, if the goal is to create a new and 'transformative' tool. This suggests that fair use could potentially apply to Meta's training process, even if the underlying data was obtained without permission.
Its ok when WE make money off it. Not You using it for "free".
If any of this can be considered "fair use" then all piracy is fair use as long as you are not making money from it.
Archive: https://archive.today/Kpeae
From the post:
>>A group of prominent intellectual property law professors has weighed in on the high-stakes AI copyright battle between several authors and Meta. In an amicus brief, the scholars argue that using copyrighted content as training data can be considered fair use under U.S. copyright law, if the goal is to create a new and 'transformative' tool. This suggests that fair use could potentially apply to Meta's training process, even if the underlying data was obtained without permission.
(post is archived)