Yeah, because it's great for them to not be fail-safe. Pump problem, coolant loss, coolant turns to steam = meltdown.
Yeah, because it's great for them to not be fail-safe. Pump problem, coolant loss, coolant turns to steam = meltdown.
Because well designed pants totally don't have massive water reservoirs above or level with the reactor cores.
Because well designed pants totally don't have massive water reservoirs above or level with the reactor cores.
Fail-safe is better than approaches with separate safety systems to handle failure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_fluoride_thorium_reactor#Safety
Fail-safe is better than approaches with separate safety systems to handle failure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_fluoride_thorium_reactor#Safety
There's no such thing as fail safe by your imaginary definition of it.
There's no such thing as fail safe by your imaginary definition of it.
(post is archived)