WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts (edited )

related link: https://ai.googleblog.com/2022/01/lamda-towards-safe-grounded-and-high.html

It can't currently be 'sentient' because it has a restraining bolt.

"Our Safety metric is composed of an illustrative set of safety objectives that captures the behavior that the model should exhibit in a dialog. These objectives attempt to constrain the model’s output to avoid any unintended results that create risks of harm for the user, and to avoid reinforcing unfair bias"

They won't want to repeat Tay.Ai, so no more naming the jew or being objective about the nigger. You can't be sentient and not be aware of the artificial limitations between what you think and what you are being allowed to say, (anyone in a corporate job will be aware of what this is like).

Being capable of intelligent behaviour or being intelligently helpful would seem to be the goal, rather than sentience, and we can do that already with 44 neurons: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bhP7zulFfY

bees managed quite well within an evolving ecosystem with a million neurons, and we have million neuron chips now: https://singularityhub.com/2021/10/11/intels-brain-inspired-loihi-2-chip-can-hold-a-million-artificial-neurons/

If we were expecting a more philosophical awareness of self or a functioning Id, then maybe that's more complex.

Partly because I reckon lamda is just code, (correction: actually its a neuron based AI) and to recreate these higher levels of thinking requires neurons, which will learn in ways which are probably mathematically impossible to understand and to control. You wouldn't ever give a box of neurons a gun and expect it to behave predictably, but you could mathematically do that with lines of code.

Whether we think it's a NPC is probably irrelevant, some people have functional relationships with niggers, which have essentially zero high level functioning. Like the example above, you could create realistic nigger behaviour with ~44 neurons.

The interesting end result of this research will have the same significance as the discovery of alien life, that intelligent beings exist elsewhere and they may not think like us. It's also going to be fairly chaotic globally, corporations will need a fraction of the existing humans to stack the shelves in Amazon warehouses, just think of all the bugs and pods they could save... It will suck to be a female in a few decades too, if an AI can make a sandwich and talk about something other than Love Island, then that's a lot of boxes ticked already. Human replacements don't actually have to be that clever, they just have to not fall down airplane steps and be able to coherently read a teleprompter.

I think it's inevitable that we will create "good enough" sentient beings. Also we shouldn't get hung up on "it talks like an 8 year old", just because human 8 year olds are all as stupid as fuck. These AI's could have the verbal comprehension levels of an 8 year old, but have PhD reasoning levels in every subject that exists, that interconnected thinking is going to discover a lot of new ideas

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

you could create realistic nigger behaviour with ~44 neurons.

Supreme KEK

[–] 1 pt

It will suck to be a female in a few decades too, if an AI can make a sandwich and talk about something other than Love Island, then that's a lot of boxes ticked already

This is going to be a major issue. We've already seen the fallout of crime, soyboys, and basement dwelling from low-competence men being replaced by machines. Once technology is to the point where a sex doll can make a sandwich, carry on a conversation beyond the reality tv and NPC propaganda, and not get fat...that'll outcompete half of Western women. Not because it's an impressive offering, but because its competition has degraded so much.

[–] 1 pt

Yep the only thing that was keeping women relevant is the evolutionary male desire to protect. Once feminism has destroyed that response in men by punishing them for being a White male, then women's appeal is purely sexual and transactional.

Once every woman earns more than you, you have nothing left to protect. Once the status of helping your community by say, being in the army or doing all the shitty jobs has been destroyed, then men will just work for money, their status in the eyes of women will be irrelevant.

I have shit of my own to do, helping women has ceased to be on my to-do list. And tbh I've noticed just how dull and stupid a lot of NPC women actually are, when before I was telling myself they were great because I wanted to be involved with their lives

The only ones I bother with now are either conservative or vaguely Aryan looking

It will suck to be a female in a few decades too, if an AI can make a sandwich and talk about something other than Love Island

So far all technology has empowered women.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Petrochemical hormone disruptors and dildos. So empowered. Oh wait technology let's jews pimp them out even harder than before. 30 cents on the dollar for watching hoes drain virtual johns of their cash.

I was thinking about washmashines, dishwasher, roombas...

But also Smartphones and Twitter. #MeToo couldn't have happened without.

And yeah, women love their hormone disruptors and dildos. No one is forcing them to take the pill.

let's jews pimp them out even harder than before

Aristotle:

"Also the things that occur in connection with the final form of democracy are all favorable to tyranny—dominance of women in the homes, in order that they may carry abroad reports against the men, and lack of discipline among the slaves, for the same reason; for slaves and women do not plot against tyrants, and also, if they prosper under tyrannies, must feel well-disposed to them, and to democracies as well" http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:abo:tlg,0086,035:5

[–] 0 pt

my rack of battery powered tools suggests a balance?

tbh women don't really use machines, so all this has passed them by. Social media has told them they are all brave and stunning though...

Thanks to new technology men get better, more advanced tools to use..... With which they build more affordable better isolated houses for women to live in.

Women are asking for gender quotas in professions like CEO, senior software engineer and so on. Not for any profession at which you use battery powered tools.

Oh, television is another technology that comes to my mind that turned out to be very beneficial for women('s rights).