That's a bullshit lie. There's nothing magical about making a battery non-removable that shrinks the volume required for a given capacity. 1cc takes up 1cc no matter whether you can remove it or not. Besides, the Motorola Razor was thinner than any phone today and it had a removable battery.
Lie = disagree. A removable battery requires more protection around it, and a way to open the case or remove the battery. That reduces design freedom. If you want to get technical every battery is removable, just not easily. Not everything inconvenient is necessarily a conspiracy to shackle you. BTW even when batteries are removable, try getting a genuine OEM battery a few years later, and one that hasn't sat on a shelf for years deteriorating.
A removable battery requires more protection around it,
What makes a removable batter more vulnerable to damage?
The components around it. Compare opening a sealed phone, with the motherboard and flex connectors all over it and the battery glued in the center, to a phone with a removable back cover and plastic covering over all the electronics except the battery area.
That’s like saying a 77 f150 was easy to work on, so a 2022 Lexus should be too. They’re completely different.
It's not like that at all. A given battery capacity requires the same amount of volume. Whether it's removable or not is irrelevant to size.
The razor phone’s capability and processing power is nowhere near what the iPhone’s is, though.
Removable or not is another question, and I do wonder how much truth there is to the difficulty in guaranteeing waterproof capability on something the public, which we can all agree, is retarded.
(post is archived)