That's exactly the reason I had such a problem with anticlutch, it wanted specific explicit phrasing that could be used as a snapshot of clearly defined, non ambiguous in court , language. If I talk about a boating accident, I want legal reasonable doubt that I meant a boating accident and nothing more.
That's exactly the reason I had such a problem with anticlutch, it wanted specific explicit phrasing that could be used as a snapshot of clearly defined, non ambiguous in court , language. If I talk about a boating accident, I want legal reasonable doubt that I meant a boating accident and nothing more.
(post is archived)