Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

338

So I have to fill out a religious exemption for my job. One of the questions is what sincere religious beliefs do I hold that prevent me from getting the covid shot. Then they can accept it or deny it or go on to ask for more proofs. WTH.. I don't think this is right but what should I write? It's hard to see where this could go. Thanks

So I have to fill out a religious exemption for my job. One of the questions is what sincere religious beliefs do I hold that prevent me from getting the covid shot. Then they can accept it or deny it or go on to ask for more proofs. WTH.. I don't think this is right but what should I write? It's hard to see where this could go. Thanks

(post is archived)

[–] • 17 pts

The shots used human "cell lines" replicated from aborted babies in their research and development. You can say you believe life begins at conception and the vaccine is not consistent with your pro-Life values. Those cells are from children who have a name before God.

Jeremiah 1:5

“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, And before you were born I consecrated you; I have appointed you a prophet to the nations.”

[–] • 1 pt

Pretty damn short but absolutely to the point. Thank you!

[–] • 1 pt

Make sure you also have proof that the vaccines have aborted fetal cells in them, because normal people think this sounds insane

[–] • 0 pt

Shit.. I will send that if asked

[–] • 0 pt

Do you have that somewhere?

[–] • -2 pt

So have 30 plus other medications, you avoiding those?

[–] • 7 pts

Tell them the vaccine is the prophecy of the mark of the beast being fulfilled. It is all part of the jew globohomo pedo satanic death cult and your belief in Jesus Christ prevents you from accepting it.

“If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or upon his hand, he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God…and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lord. And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever; they have no rest day and night, those who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name” (Revelation 14:9-11 NAS).

[–] • 1 pt

Based. I believe that as well, but I'm wondering if I can quote law of some kind as well.

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 1 pt

Thank you, I tried loading the link 3 times and it doesn't fully load.

[–] • 0 pt

Medical privacy Act of 1967,maybe is what you're looking for.

[–] • 1 pt

This might work well to eliminate the aborted cells arguments

[–] • 6 pts

I wrote mine myself, and while I won't just copy/paste it here, I'll at least tell you what I used. Maybe it helps, maybe it doesn't. First I started with being created in God's image, with my DNA being His signature. I cited Genesis 1:26,27, John 1:3, Jeremiah 1:4,5 for these. Then I went on to say as a born again believer I am not my own, am indwelt by His Spirit, etc.: 1Corinthians 6:19,20, John 3:16, 1 Corinthians 3:16,17, Galatians 1:15. After that I used the fact that I am pro-life and against things derived from aborted children, that life is precious, and given to us by our Creator: Genesis 9:5,6, Exodus 20:13, Proverbs 6:16-19, Hebrews 10:26,27. I also happen to be a Sabbath keeper, and abide by the dietary laws of the OT, but I didn't specify which dietary laws, so there's some variation there that covers the occasional bacon or pepperoni. I reiterated that to take these shots that have been derived as a result of experimentation using aborted fetuses would be a sin since life begins at conception in the womb: Genesis 9:5,6, Exodus 20:13, James 4:17, Psalm 139:13-16, Job 10:11. Being born again, new creation, and haven't had any vaccines since then: 2 Corinthians 5:17. And I finished with stating that I would not take this vaccine no matter the cost, Matthew 10:28. And Psalm 139 has a lot in it all by itself.

Again, maybe you find this helpful, maybe you don't. Either way, I hope you get the exemption. Mine, as well as everyone else at my job's, is still on hold at the moment, but there has been no explanation why. I think at best, this will be a temporary fix, as I can't see them allowing this to derail their global agenda.

[–] • 1 pt

Thank you very much. I appreciate your very thought out and well stated suggestions. I will do my best to use what I can of your example. This feels like persecution. If you remember, please get back to me if it was accepted or not. Thanks.

[–] • 1 pt

I can finally mark this one as read. I got notification a few weeks ago from someone in HR, but nothing in writing. Today was the deadline for us to either take the shot, or claim a religious or medical exemption, with failure to do so resulting in unpaid administrative leave. Well, today has come and gone, and so far, no notice that I am either on administrative leave, or instructions to not show up for work tomorrow.

Hang tough, this will end one way or another.

[–] • 0 pt

We are unironically in this together. If we all stick to.our gins and stand unwavering it will make waves in the outcomes of companies and businesses. Sink or swim for them. I'm standing strong too. Let me know what happens and I will as well. 1 job of mine accepted the religious exemption and my other one is pending . Both are severely short staffed. Hopefully this works in our favor.

[–] • 0 pt

Do you have the source for the aborted fetus? I'd like to use it as well.

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

It does state moderna and Pfizer don’t use the aborted fetal cell genes though, I could see the employer not accepting that reason for a blanket exemption.

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts (edited )

I urge you to review EEOC's page on religious acommodations: https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/what-you-should-know-workplace-religious-accommodation

On how religion is defined:

A religious practice may be sincerely held by an individual even if newly adopted, not consistently observed, or different from the commonly followed tenets of the individual's religion.

Remember that you are already exempt. You are just trying to get your emplyer to acknowledge the exemption.

Social, political, or economic philosophies, or personal preferences, are not "religious" beliefs under Title VII.

Make sure to not stray into social, political, or economic philosophies, or into scie tific arguments.

Title VII also prohibits disparate treatment, job segregation, or harassment based on religious belief or practice (or lack thereof), as well as retaliation for the exercise of EEO rights.

They are asking you intrusive questions about your religious beliefs because they want to harass and discriminate against your religion. Don't let them.

In your response I would tell your employer that: - You already have a religious exemption. - You want your employer to acknowlege it. - That the Inquisition-style prying into your religious beliefs will be construed as harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.

However, they CAN ask you about your religious beliefs for the purpose of acommodating them. They can demand this to be an interactive process. They might ask you to wear a mask all the time or get tested weekly instead if the vaccine. Is this acceptable to you or do these things also go against your religion?

Asking to work from home, if that is an option, could be one reasonable acommodation they could provide.

[–] • 0 pt

How should I answer then? Canyon write me an answer lol 😆 you seem well versed about this. I just don't know if I quote the Bible or the fact fetal cells are in it?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Write it like you would a legal document. Look at the law and use that langugage to request they acknowledge your exemption and provide acommodation.

Here's a succinct summary of Title VII:

Title VII requires federal agencies, upon notice of a request, to reasonably accommodate employees whose sincerely held religious beliefs, practices or observances conflict with work requirements, unless the accommodation would create an undue hardship.

In other words they must acommodate your sincerely held religious belief. The only way they can deny your acommodation is if it places an undue burden on the employer.

We write our request using the language of Title VII.

"Title VII exempts me from receiving the vaccine due to my sincerely held religious beliefs. As a reasonable acommodation I request that you waive the vaccine requirement. Thank you."

It's that simple. Though be prepared for your employer to push back. If the reasons for vaccines is to prevent the spread of covid, you might want to offer them something you would be willing to do instead of getting the vaccine. It's a negotiation. How hard you want to push is up to you and depends on your individual circumstances.

And if they inquire about your religion, remember that the only valid reason for them to do so is to figure out how to acommodate you. Always bring the discussion back to that point.

[–] • 0 pt

It was accepted. Thanks 😊 for your help!

[–] • 0 pt

So it states what religious beliefs I hold that necessitates this request for accommodation, and that they can ask for more information or just not accept it.

[–] • 1 pt

Then when you’re fired you can head to the labor board for religious discrimination

[–] • 0 pt

Im too disorganized to keep track of things like this but someone needs to archive this before they change the definition like the WHO

[–] • 4 pts

Don’t write anything that can be construed as a philosophical, sociological, or even scientific objection.

Trust me.

And if you can get a pastor/priest to sign it, or even add to it, that will bolster your chances.

Of course they will still probably reject it if you’re a white male, or if it isn’t possible for you to work from home.

[–] • 2 pts
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

It's kind of a cheap out, but you can just print the front of a card, fill it out, scan it, and email it to whoever. They all want the numbers high so they won't question it.

It's kinda gay because you are playing along with their stupid game, but they asked for it. Ask a stupid question get a stupid answer.

[–] • 0 pt

That may work short term but eventually there will be a national registry and they will start hunting down people who faked their documents

[–] • 1 pt

Your body is your temple, several Bible verses back this up. Don't mention the contents of the vaccine.

[–] • 0 pt

Follow up is that I was accepted. Thanks for your help

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Simple. Federal judges allowed HOSPITAL DOCTORS to claim they refuse it because Fetus tissue used in some stages to create all these vaccines. Some proved Catholic doctrine bars it.

Judges agreed last week.

Judge temporarily suspends NY vaccine mandate for health care workers who claim religious exemption: https://www.4029tv.com/article/judge-suspends-ny-state-vaccine-mandate-for-health-care-workers-who-claim-religious-exemption/37600750

The plaintiffs cited religious convictions that prevent them from being inoculated with vaccines that they said "were tested, developed or produced with fetal cells line derived from procured abortions." Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna used cell lines originating from fetal tissue to test their vaccines

People should just get copy of court filing, and use the resisting doctors own arguments, now that there is case law precedent.

Here. Here is the over 100 page court filing that WORKED!: (PDF) https://files.catbox.moe/nzydhk.pdf

Use "FETAL TISSUE" as reason for religious stance and federal judges just ruled that's valid. Refer to Catholic beliefs in Exhibit D page 106 and other pages

Simple.

never comply. make them fire you. religious angle is still worthwhile and worked in New York State for 17 physicians that refused due to UNBORN FETAL TISSUE used at some stages of mRNA development. You could use same paperwork filing.

UNBORN FETAL TISSUE is used because of born people known as NIGGERS suing for 1 billion dollars (and winning) using jew lawyers decades later. Yup, all of medicine switched to fetal cell tumor tissue after nigger grandkids sued for 1 billion shekels:

https://afro.com/henrietta-lacks-family-takes-it-hela-cells-case-to-civil-rights-attorney-ben-crump/

https://werepstem.com/2020/10/30/henrietta-lacks-foundation-recieves-historic-restitution-for-use-of-hela-cells/

https://www.wkyt.com/2021/07/30/family-henrietta-lacks-sues-pharmaceutical-companies-theft-her-cells/

Niggers and jews forced science to switch to unborn, but unborn cells allow you to REJECT mRNA vaccines!!!!

just get copy of federal judge court filing, and use the resisting doctors own arguments, now that there is case law precedent.

Here. Here is the over 100 page court filing : (PDF) https://files.catbox.moe/nzydhk.pdf

Use "FETAL TISSUE" as reason for religious stance and federal judges just ruled that's valid. Refer to Catholic beliefs in Exhibit D page 106 and other pages

greedy jews and greedy niggers as i showed, created this one new excuse for you.

[–] • 0 pt

Thank you very much

[–] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Yes. Because of greedy niggers and greedy jew lawyers :

all of medicine switched to fetal cell tumor tissue after nigger grandkids sued for 1 billion shekels:

https://afro.com/henrietta-lacks-family-takes-it-hela-cells-case-to-civil-rights-attorney-ben-crump/

https://werepstem.com/2020/10/30/henrietta-lacks-foundation-recieves-historic-restitution-for-use-of-hela-cells/

https://www.wkyt.com/2021/07/30/family-henrietta-lacks-sues-pharmaceutical-companies-theft-her-cells/

If it were not for greedy nigger grandkids and their jew lawyers, no need for FETAL tissue.

[–] • 0 pt

Well, that's great, (if true, this looks dubious to me) but does not change the fact that if you reject the use of these cells, then you reject the 30 other medications as well.

[–] • 1 pt

Jehovah's witnesses do not allow for Blood transfusions etcetera, they certainly are not gonna allow for experimental vaccinations

[–] • 0 pt

They absolutely do and they’re encouraging their worldwide congregation to get the jab. They say “it’s everyone’s personal choice” while simultaneously applauding their governing body members and “bethelites” for taking the appropriate steps (jab) to protect the sanctity of life.

[–] • 1 pt

Damn, well that escalated quickly. Only a decade ago, a mother refused to get blood and bleed to death from a minor car accident, citing religious beliefs. The guy who caused the accident was charged with manslaughter.

Load more (7 replies)