Sovereign citizen is a oxymoron. I see you haven't done any research on this. For it is real and would be the biggest kick in the gonads on these criminals destroying our lives.
They have incorporated themselves and made us their slaves with the birth certificate.
28 U.S. Code § 3002 (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation.
Now, you're way off base.
No, he has a point. The United States is a corporation. You are goyem.
There is a corporation called "The United States" for the purposes of Title 28 of the USC. That does not mean that definition applies to anything outside Title 28 of the USC.
and the existence of that definition within that Title does not change anything not related to Title 28 of the USC.
He is conflating definitions within Title 28 to the application of each state's Transportation Code. This is where he is off base. Being a corporation under Title 28 doesn't have shit to do with how the Transportation Code in being enforced by law enforcement, the prosecuting attorneys of each municipality, and the courts.
28 U.S. Code § 3002 (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation.
Citing it this way is super misleading, since that particular code is about how court cases are handled against the "United States", meaning that this particular part is saying that in a court case, "a Federal corporation" when sued is listed as "United States" as the defendant/plaintiff.
Yes. Definitions under Title 28 of the USC apply to the code within Title 28 of the USC.
Another great example is the claim corporations are people. While this is true in the commercial code and codes related to corporations, in the penal code a person is usually defined as "a living human being".
Instead of a living man or woman? Interesting. More words to confuse and hide the truth perhaps?
Your birth certificate name was made in all caps, on a bank note with a CUSIP number. You are using a corporation to buy everything.
I'm more open than most to the idea that the country was turned into some sort of corporation some time in the past, but this is hardly proof of that.
This part of the legal code is saying that if you get involved in court with a Federal owned corporation, it will be listed as "United States" as the plaintiff/defendant, which ultimately means very little.
To give an analogy, I could do business as "Kikeslayer Emporium R' Us" and then any time you'd sue me or the corporation or vice versa have that listed as the defendant/plaintiff (depending on the case), but that doesn't mean "I, the person owning said corporation, AM one", does it?
(post is archived)