Lol, I'll be gentle. So we now apply that trait back onto a human context.
By "in group preference" did you mean "they're a different species, that's the trait"? (Just for clarification). If so, here's the consistency test: If you and I were a difference species, would it be an obligation for me to save your child?
Yeah, not gonna touch the religion one. Maybe a poalcast discussion for religion.
Well personally I'm not atheist so that would be my actual argument however I was trying to argue from the atheist perspective. I suppose no if we were a different species from an evolutionary point of view it may even be to your detriment to save my child.
Let me explain better: In the news today, it's come out that humans from different parts of the world are different species. Scots are a different species than Germans. You're the Scot, I'm the German. We're neighbors, good friends, our kids are friends, etc, etc. Is it a moral obligation for me to save your kid?
Assuming its a first world type of situation then I would have to say yes.
(post is archived)