10 deadlifts @ 100 pounds doesn't take NEARLY as much effort in any measure as 1 rep at 1000 pounds. What you said is so wrong it's laughable.
It takes exactly the same energy, the effort is irrelevant, exertion and effort are two things that you're confusing in order to have any sort of valid argument. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. The strain of doing 1 1,000 pound rep is probably greater on your body, the energy expended however is the same, as it takes the same amount of power to lift both masses. Then there's the time element, which you have ignored as part of the equation.
Energy used is not a linear function as force grows.
energy used is the same, although I do agree that larger mass requires exponentially more force. So your math is off, if it takes 4x as much energy to lift a mass double the size, a 25 vs 100lbs mass requires 16x more energy. So we are both idiots and both wrong.
Another counterexample, setting your car to drive at just the lowest first gear possible over 100 miles doesn't take NEARLY as much gas as doing the exact same distance in the exact same car going any speed higher.
Now you're entering MY world. The theoretical best fuel economy is achieved by the highest speed at the lowest rpm possible. However there are nearly infinite factors affecting this. Reducing the size of the input shaft relative to the output shaft creates torque multiplication at the expense of output shaft velocity, the inverse is also true.
*using my retardation, I've concluded that it would take 100 deadlifts of 100 lbs over a certain time span to equal the effort in 1 rep at 1000 lbs over a certain time span.
Use another example, pull ups. I can do 10 pull ups in a row, in about 30 seconds, but not 100 in 300 seconds(5 min).
It takes exactly the same energy,
False. A biological system isn't a 100% perfect user-of-energy. Yes it still follows the laws of thermodynamics, but those are optimums, they are not minimums. Biology isn't a math equation. Biology isn't perfect.
energy used is the same, although I do agree that larger mass requires exponentially more force. So your math is off, if it takes 4x as much energy to lift a mass double the size, a 25 vs 100lbs mass requires 16x more energy. So we are both idiots and both wrong.
What the fuck
you're wrong but here's how you're right but we're both wrong
No. Everything I stated was 100% correct. You're just a fucking retard unwilling to admit you were and are wrong without also claiming I'm wrong.
Now you're entering MY world. The theoretical best fuel economy is achieved by the highest speed at the lowest rpm possible. However there are nearly infinite factors affecting this. Reducing the size of the input shaft relative to the output shaft creates torque multiplication at the expense of output shaft velocity, the inverse is also true.
Literally another;
you're wrong, but here's why you're right
Dude fuck off. You're annoying as fuck.
You're just a fucking retard unwilling to admit you were and are wrong without also claiming I'm wrong.
You are wrong, and twice as retarded, please don't talk about cars or mechanical things, you'll only embarrass yourself like a faggot who tries to act tough.
I thought the white man was supposed to be great and stuff, but all I hear is nigger talk.
this has anything to do with cars but an example I made that is 100% correct
2 realities - each is literally identical 1 car in each - literally identical 1 track of length 100 miles in each reality one car - car A - travels the 100 miles and goes 10 miles per hour the entire way. the other car - car B - travels the 100 miles and oes 200 miles the entire way. both care reach the end Car A will have used FAR LESS gas than car B.
Your'e an idiot.
Equal reps * sets * weight DOES NOT equal the same amount of either effort nor energy used. The human body is NOT a perfect system. You are claiming that it is. It isn't, and you are a dumbass.
(post is archived)