WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

559

This is not u for debate. People who have trouble with this often go all the way down and lift their hands up before pushing up again. Your chest shouldn't "kiss" the ground, though that's usually acceptable - I guess - if you're doing reps quickly. It should touch the ground, your ribcage should squish the skin.

e; Some of you are such gigantic idiots. This isn't suprising but it is annoying. If you were to be running miles and you ran 4870 feet, could you count that as a lap (rep)? No. You could not. Just like a full rep of a push up is arms completely extended to arms completely flexed. Up with the concentric, down with the eccentric.

This is not u for debate. People who have trouble with this often go all the way down and lift their hands up before pushing up again. Your chest shouldn't "kiss" the ground, though that's usually acceptable - I guess - if you're doing reps quickly. It should touch the ground, your ribcage should squish the skin. e; Some of you are such gigantic idiots. This isn't suprising but it is annoying. If you were to be running miles and you ran 4870 feet, could you count that as a lap (rep)? No. You could not. Just like a full rep of a push up is arms completely extended to arms completely flexed. Up with the concentric, down with the eccentric.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

This is not u for debate.

Sure it is. I do more than one type of push-up. In one of them I hold the position at the bottom of the rep with my chest NOT touching the ground for a three-count.

[–] 0 pt

Okay great. A part of a rep does not equal a whole rep. You're equating something to another that aren't equal things. A rep of a push up is a complete range of motion. No less. You aren't talking about the complete range, you're talking about one single part of it. The top of the force curve after the concentric push. Holding at the top, middle, bottom or somewhere else doesn't change what a rep is.

[–] 0 pt

You're equating something to another that aren't equal things.

Or perhaps I'm not explaining myself clearly.

Standard push-up (to me) means starting from the plank position, lowering my chest until it bumps the floor (without resting on the floor), then raising back to a plank. That's one rep.

Option 2: Starting at the plank, lower chest to just above the floor but not touching, hold for three seconds, then raise to a plank. That's one rep.

There are others as well, including inclines, declines, raised foot, etc., but those are the main two I perform.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Standard push-up (to me) means starting from the plank position, lowering my chest until it bumps the floor (without resting on the floor), then raising back to a plank. That's one rep.

So your arms aren't fully extended? You're missing more than half the range of motion. Or do you do planks by fully extending your arms?

(without resting on the floor)

I never once said your chest needed to rest on the floor. Not here, there or anywhere. I said "touch" the ground. I don't get why all this arguing about this fact about a specific exercise. I seriously don't. The list at the end of your reply are modifications on form that are different exercises, work different muscle, similar muscle in different ways, and are very different on structural stresses of the skeletal system. I didn't in OP mention those or any other post or reply.