Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Since most of the Apollo astronauts lived long, healthy lives, we must assume that the radiation danger between the Earth and the Moon is limited.

[–] • 0 pt

Agreed. There are several radiation models applied to humans. The truth is, we do not fully understand the effect radiation has on humans. Sure, huge doses which wholesale destroy genetics is understood. But lower doses are not well understood. Even the basic question of where does risk increase can't be clearly answered.

Background radiation in some cities provide more than the annual "safe" levels, and these people can have lower cancer rates. Iirc, linear no threshold is the standard but is known to be extremely wrong. Yet it's the basis of those badges and whatnot.

Iirc, non-linear models more accurately describe reality but exact values and scaling are problematic because it requires human testing. So everyone uses the wildly inaccurate defacto standard. Which, of course, lends no favors to these types of discussions.

Been well over a decade since I last looked at this so my memory may be faulty on names. Regardless, should allow for something to research and better understand the complexity of radiation dangers in scope of the topic.

[–] • 1 pt

What you call light, is radiation

[–] • 1 pt

Yes. Ionizing and non-ionizing radiation bring very different things to the table.

[–] • 2 pts

LoL

Whitey be bringing magic into the conversation

[–] • 1 pt

Yeee, real documentation here, like....

  • what was the real path taken ? (just saying "we went around it" it is not really something, right ?)
  • nice cutout, conveniently missing acual measures and actual metal composition (there are quite a few types of stainless steel)

But again, no need to be so hyped up, I just need to wait until someone go there and take pictures....

Have a nice day and enjoy the sun, beautiful day

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

what was the real path taken ? (just saying "we went around it" it is not really something, right ?)

www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11fltpln_final_reformat.pdf

there are quite a few types of stainless steel

does it matter? 309, 310 or 2111HTR - pick one... the space shuttle used Inconel 718 and A-286 steel

the outer resin was ablative anyway

AVCOAT 5026-39 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19690013568/downloads/19690013568.pdf

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

The simple truth is, he really doesn't care. He's not here to learn. He's here to push a psyop to discredit actual conspiracies. Facts don't matter. Only FUD, gas lighting, and consensus cracking matters.

https://poal.co/s/spaceisfakeandgay/501129

His use is textbook, in that he tied his gaslighting to an acknowledged psyop. "This is fake, therefore something else is fake." False equivalence. Everytime you see that, you've identified a shcill.

[–] • 0 pt

Better,

But, the flight plan is a plan, not a path, at least I could not find an equation or anything that say the path of the crafth ather launch.

Also, there is no van allen mentioned or any radiation test before and after the entry-exit into the belt (there are periodic reading)

the outer coat, apparently, has no radiation shielding property that I can find

the actual material used for the craft and the thickness is relevant to find out the radiation shielding properties

In any case, I must congratulate with you, this is the first attempt to provide some info

not yet successful, but, who knows.....

Thanks !!

[–] • 1 pt

pg30 has the burn schedule with delta XYZ cords, this would require a simulator of the apollo computer, or some other flight simulator and mass/gravity data

really all you have is it takes off with a 72° launch azimuth, burns for x seconds and that's now your flightpath for the next few days, you could correlate this with the tracking data from the madrid and goldstone dishes

the outer coat, apparently, has no radiation shielding property

yes, it was risky but it worked. the monitoring badges worn by the crews and analysed after the missions indicated that the astronauts received doses roughly less than that of a standard CT scan https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/tnD7080RadProtect.pdf

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

All documented. You ignoring it, without looking, while claiming it didn't exist only confirms you're dishonesty.

Much covered in the video. NASA has a huge library. Yet you claim it doesn't exist because you refuse to look.

[–] • 2 pts

NASA has a huge library

yep, I'm going to have to add this to my big list of why flat earthers are retards, there is just so much darned stuff that is documented in extreme detail, all of which would have had to been typed up by the alien lizard overlords to fool future generations...

it would have been cheaper to just fly to the moon and stop off at mars for lunch, than to create that paper trail

[–] • 0 pt

I've personally looked at original lander specifications. But spent most of my time looking at the suits. Just the cooling technology is amazingly complex. You can spend days looking at physics of the cooling systems.

[–] • 1 pt

If there are charged particles in that belt, such as those electrons. It might be conceivable to create electricity from that reaction.

Iirc that is how the photoelectric effect works. The photons are absorbed into the electrons, and those electrons go to a higher energy state, essentially creating electricity.

[–] • 0 pt

I can pass my finger through a candle flame without injury. You can't explain that, either!