Better,
But, the flight plan is a plan, not a path, at least I could not find an equation or anything that say the path of the crafth ather launch.
Also, there is no van allen mentioned or any radiation test before and after the entry-exit into the belt (there are periodic reading)
the outer coat, apparently, has no radiation shielding property that I can find
the actual material used for the craft and the thickness is relevant to find out the radiation shielding properties
In any case, I must congratulate with you, this is the first attempt to provide some info
not yet successful, but, who knows.....
Thanks !!
pg30 has the burn schedule with delta XYZ cords, this would require a simulator of the apollo computer, or some other flight simulator and mass/gravity data
really all you have is it takes off with a 72° launch azimuth, burns for x seconds and that's now your flightpath for the next few days, you could correlate this with the tracking data from the madrid and goldstone dishes
the outer coat, apparently, has no radiation shielding property
yes, it was risky but it worked. the monitoring badges worn by the crews and analysed after the missions indicated that the astronauts received doses roughly less than that of a standard CT scan https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/tnD7080RadProtect.pdf
Much better
Clearly, the flight path is not in scale + there is no "correlation" with where the vanallen belts are
The first event on flight path is at 2:44:26, what happened before that ? where is the craft at that time ?
Having a trust with xyz vector without previous position can land you anywhere
Maybe you have the tracking data from monitoring stations ?
The report on radiation, stating that no problem has been found with radiation is an obvious consequence of reality not being what is supposed to be. It says that there should have been issues, but, no issues happened..... good, but why ?
Basically, there are things that "just happened"
So, now, the fact that NASA lost the documentation on how the "magic" happened.... well, let's say it is puzzling.
Please continue, you have better info than normal but nobody has the documentation that is needed to recreate the apollo mission.
We just have to wait for someone to take fresh pictures of the landing sites.
Have a nice day and enjoy life
there is no "correlation" with where the vanallen belts are
well it's not a thing you can look at, it's just the earth's magnetosphere. If you took off from the North pole you wouldn't see any of it. You can calculate where it is and how strong it is at any XYZ, just as you can calculate what a magnet will do in a motor
You have all the space flights from China and India now, what happens in the vanallen belt is beyond question really
Having a trust with xyz vector without previous position can land you anywhere
You have the launch site as datum? throw a ball at a basketball hoop, it's exactly the same equation
Maybe you have the tracking data from monitoring stations ?
pdf pg5 https://web.mit.edu/digitalapollo/Documents/Chapter8/trackingapollo.pdf
nobody has the documentation that is needed to recreate the apollo mission
the BBC doesn't have all the Dr Who episodes either, that pre Woke shit is priceless
if they were lying, why even bother to create the documentation? just say it's classified. there were hundreds of thousands of people involved, thousands directly involved in tracking the flight, a few hundred who have been to space and back, but so far no deathbed confessions of "lol, it was just a prank bro"
The reflector is still up there, just visit one of the universities with a ranging laser and ask for a demo, I'm sure they still check it periodically
(post is archived)