Yeee, real documentation here, like....
- what was the real path taken ? (just saying "we went around it" it is not really something, right ?)
- nice cutout, conveniently missing acual measures and actual metal composition (there are quite a few types of stainless steel)
But again, no need to be so hyped up, I just need to wait until someone go there and take pictures....
Have a nice day and enjoy the sun, beautiful day
what was the real path taken ? (just saying "we went around it" it is not really something, right ?)
www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11fltpln_final_reformat.pdf
there are quite a few types of stainless steel
does it matter? 309, 310 or 2111HTR - pick one... the space shuttle used Inconel 718 and A-286 steel
the outer resin was ablative anyway
AVCOAT 5026-39 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19690013568/downloads/19690013568.pdf
The simple truth is, he really doesn't care. He's not here to learn. He's here to push a psyop to discredit actual conspiracies. Facts don't matter. Only FUD, gas lighting, and consensus cracking matters.
https://poal.co/s/spaceisfakeandgay/501129
His use is textbook, in that he tied his gaslighting to an acknowledged psyop. "This is fake, therefore something else is fake." False equivalence. Everytime you see that, you've identified a shcill.
Better,
But, the flight plan is a plan, not a path, at least I could not find an equation or anything that say the path of the crafth ather launch.
Also, there is no van allen mentioned or any radiation test before and after the entry-exit into the belt (there are periodic reading)
the outer coat, apparently, has no radiation shielding property that I can find
the actual material used for the craft and the thickness is relevant to find out the radiation shielding properties
In any case, I must congratulate with you, this is the first attempt to provide some info
not yet successful, but, who knows.....
Thanks !!
pg30 has the burn schedule with delta XYZ cords, this would require a simulator of the apollo computer, or some other flight simulator and mass/gravity data
really all you have is it takes off with a 72° launch azimuth, burns for x seconds and that's now your flightpath for the next few days, you could correlate this with the tracking data from the madrid and goldstone dishes
the outer coat, apparently, has no radiation shielding property
yes, it was risky but it worked. the monitoring badges worn by the crews and analysed after the missions indicated that the astronauts received doses roughly less than that of a standard CT scan https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/tnD7080RadProtect.pdf
All documented. You ignoring it, without looking, while claiming it didn't exist only confirms you're dishonesty.
Much covered in the video. NASA has a huge library. Yet you claim it doesn't exist because you refuse to look.
NASA has a huge library
yep, I'm going to have to add this to my big list of why flat earthers are retards, there is just so much darned stuff that is documented in extreme detail, all of which would have had to been typed up by the alien lizard overlords to fool future generations...
it would have been cheaper to just fly to the moon and stop off at mars for lunch, than to create that paper trail
I've personally looked at original lander specifications. But spent most of my time looking at the suits. Just the cooling technology is amazingly complex. You can spend days looking at physics of the cooling systems.
(post is archived)