WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

what was the real path taken ? (just saying "we went around it" it is not really something, right ?)

www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11fltpln_final_reformat.pdf

there are quite a few types of stainless steel

does it matter? 309, 310 or 2111HTR - pick one... the space shuttle used Inconel 718 and A-286 steel

the outer resin was ablative anyway

AVCOAT 5026-39 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19690013568/downloads/19690013568.pdf

[–] 2 pts (edited )

The simple truth is, he really doesn't care. He's not here to learn. He's here to push a psyop to discredit actual conspiracies. Facts don't matter. Only FUD, gas lighting, and consensus cracking matters.

https://poal.co/s/spaceisfakeandgay/501129

His use is textbook, in that he tied his gaslighting to an acknowledged psyop. "This is fake, therefore something else is fake." False equivalence. Everytime you see that, you've identified a shcill.

[–] 0 pt

Better,

But, the flight plan is a plan, not a path, at least I could not find an equation or anything that say the path of the crafth ather launch.

Also, there is no van allen mentioned or any radiation test before and after the entry-exit into the belt (there are periodic reading)

the outer coat, apparently, has no radiation shielding property that I can find

the actual material used for the craft and the thickness is relevant to find out the radiation shielding properties

In any case, I must congratulate with you, this is the first attempt to provide some info

not yet successful, but, who knows.....

Thanks !!

[–] 1 pt

pg30 has the burn schedule with delta XYZ cords, this would require a simulator of the apollo computer, or some other flight simulator and mass/gravity data

really all you have is it takes off with a 72° launch azimuth, burns for x seconds and that's now your flightpath for the next few days, you could correlate this with the tracking data from the madrid and goldstone dishes

the outer coat, apparently, has no radiation shielding property

yes, it was risky but it worked. the monitoring badges worn by the crews and analysed after the missions indicated that the astronauts received doses roughly less than that of a standard CT scan https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/tnD7080RadProtect.pdf

[–] 0 pt

Much better

Clearly, the flight path is not in scale + there is no "correlation" with where the vanallen belts are

The first event on flight path is at 2:44:26, what happened before that ? where is the craft at that time ?

Having a trust with xyz vector without previous position can land you anywhere

Maybe you have the tracking data from monitoring stations ?

The report on radiation, stating that no problem has been found with radiation is an obvious consequence of reality not being what is supposed to be. It says that there should have been issues, but, no issues happened..... good, but why ?

Basically, there are things that "just happened"

So, now, the fact that NASA lost the documentation on how the "magic" happened.... well, let's say it is puzzling.

Please continue, you have better info than normal but nobody has the documentation that is needed to recreate the apollo mission.

We just have to wait for someone to take fresh pictures of the landing sites.

Have a nice day and enjoy life