WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

there is no "correlation" with where the vanallen belts are

well it's not a thing you can look at, it's just the earth's magnetosphere. If you took off from the North pole you wouldn't see any of it. You can calculate where it is and how strong it is at any XYZ, just as you can calculate what a magnet will do in a motor

You have all the space flights from China and India now, what happens in the vanallen belt is beyond question really

Having a trust with xyz vector without previous position can land you anywhere

You have the launch site as datum? throw a ball at a basketball hoop, it's exactly the same equation

Maybe you have the tracking data from monitoring stations ?

pdf pg5 https://web.mit.edu/digitalapollo/Documents/Chapter8/trackingapollo.pdf

nobody has the documentation that is needed to recreate the apollo mission

the BBC doesn't have all the Dr Who episodes either, that pre Woke shit is priceless

if they were lying, why even bother to create the documentation? just say it's classified. there were hundreds of thousands of people involved, thousands directly involved in tracking the flight, a few hundred who have been to space and back, but so far no deathbed confessions of "lol, it was just a prank bro"

The reflector is still up there, just visit one of the universities with a ranging laser and ask for a demo, I'm sure they still check it periodically

[–] 0 pt

Thanks, you are better documented than the average

The tracking info is fuzzy enough to be inconclusive, but, it shows effort, as expected

A reflector does not need an astronaut to be put there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon

we will not know the truth until it is possible to have new images + video of the landing sites

I can wait

Have a nice day

[–] 0 pt

A reflector does not need an astronaut to be put there

it still needs a lander to place it?

new images + video of the landing sites

they have been coming in for years? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

[–] 0 pt

The point is having a manned mission, it is fairly simple to have a robotic mission to place a reflector

Going to mars is "simple" if no humans are involved

As far as I can read from the article there are people claiming to have tracked, received, supposedly pictures at such low resolution that .... whatever, it does not change my life, nor yours.

The first two photos in the page, something that CAN actually show something relevant.... are actually from "apollo mission" and .... can be staged. (Yes, nasa had a moon simulator, used to train the astronauts for landing) and yes, thay had plenty of high res pictures of the moon.

So, again, relax, the "glitches" in the narrative are there and are well documented. If they are glitches in reality or a hoax .... we will see.

Have a nice day